Can the web-form WHOQOL-BREF be an alternative to the paper-form?

Wen Ching Chen, Jung Der Wang, Jing Shiang Hwang, Chiao Chicy Chen, Chia Huei Wu, Grace Yao

研究成果: Article同行評審

15 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

The purpose of this study was to test whether the web version is an alternative to the paper version of the short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF). Two studies were conducted. Study 1 used crossover self-controlled trials with 80 participants to compare the web and paper versions and to determine the test-retest reliability of the web version. Study 2 used data from 1,016 web participants to analyze the internal consistency and concurrent and construct validity of the web version. The correlations of domain scores between the web and paper versions ranged from 0.71 to 0.85. Dependent t tests showed no significant differences in domain scores between these two versions. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for test-retest reliability of web version ranged from 0.79 to 0.91. The Cronbach's α for internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.60 to 0.83. Multiple regression models indicated that the web version has good concurrent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the second-order hierarchical factor model also supported the construct validity of the web version. The web version of the WHOQOL-BREF can be the alternative to the paper version for health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) evaluation.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)97-114
頁數18
期刊Social Indicators Research
94
發行號1
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)

指紋 深入研究「Can the web-form WHOQOL-BREF be an alternative to the paper-form?」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此