Carbon allowance allocation in the shipping industry under EEDI and non-EEDI

Ching-Chih Chang, Po Chien Huang

研究成果: Article

摘要

The CO 2 emissions targets in this study are based on the Paris Agreement, which aims to cut emissions in 2050 to half of the 2005 levels, with a focus on the shipping industry. This study uses data for various kinds of vessels following the guidelines set in the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)and examines emission levels and the results of using different strategies during three different business climates. Carbon allowance allocations and cost benefit ratios (CBR)are included. The results show that the minimal free carbon allowances in 2050 for vessels in keeping with EEDI or non-EEDI scenarios should be set so that (1)under prosperous business cycles they are 29% and 14%; (2)under steady business cycles 83% and 42%; (3)under sluggish business cycles 510% and 255%, respectively. In addition, when shipping companies follow the emission cap guidelines, the CBR in 2050 for vessels in both scenarios will be (1)37.52% and 47.45% during prosperous business cycles; (2)43.49% and 45.65%during steady business cycles; (3)and 53.60% and 53.83% during sluggish business cycles, respectively. The results indicate that during prosperous business cycles, although the free carbon allowance for shipping companies will be greatly insufficient, their profits will still be higher than during sluggish business cycles.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)341-350
頁數10
期刊Science of the Total Environment
678
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 2019 八月 15

指紋

business cycle
Freight transportation
shipping
energy efficiency
Energy efficiency
Carbon
industry
carbon
Industry
vessel
index
allocation
allowance
Carbon Monoxide
Costs
Profitability
climate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

引用此文

@article{497ad19d54844f2b8d4b287fc42147e6,
title = "Carbon allowance allocation in the shipping industry under EEDI and non-EEDI",
abstract = "The CO 2 emissions targets in this study are based on the Paris Agreement, which aims to cut emissions in 2050 to half of the 2005 levels, with a focus on the shipping industry. This study uses data for various kinds of vessels following the guidelines set in the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)and examines emission levels and the results of using different strategies during three different business climates. Carbon allowance allocations and cost benefit ratios (CBR)are included. The results show that the minimal free carbon allowances in 2050 for vessels in keeping with EEDI or non-EEDI scenarios should be set so that (1)under prosperous business cycles they are 29{\%} and 14{\%}; (2)under steady business cycles 83{\%} and 42{\%}; (3)under sluggish business cycles 510{\%} and 255{\%}, respectively. In addition, when shipping companies follow the emission cap guidelines, the CBR in 2050 for vessels in both scenarios will be (1)37.52{\%} and 47.45{\%} during prosperous business cycles; (2)43.49{\%} and 45.65{\%}during steady business cycles; (3)and 53.60{\%} and 53.83{\%} during sluggish business cycles, respectively. The results indicate that during prosperous business cycles, although the free carbon allowance for shipping companies will be greatly insufficient, their profits will still be higher than during sluggish business cycles.",
author = "Ching-Chih Chang and Huang, {Po Chien}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.215",
language = "English",
volume = "678",
pages = "341--350",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carbon allowance allocation in the shipping industry under EEDI and non-EEDI

AU - Chang, Ching-Chih

AU - Huang, Po Chien

PY - 2019/8/15

Y1 - 2019/8/15

N2 - The CO 2 emissions targets in this study are based on the Paris Agreement, which aims to cut emissions in 2050 to half of the 2005 levels, with a focus on the shipping industry. This study uses data for various kinds of vessels following the guidelines set in the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)and examines emission levels and the results of using different strategies during three different business climates. Carbon allowance allocations and cost benefit ratios (CBR)are included. The results show that the minimal free carbon allowances in 2050 for vessels in keeping with EEDI or non-EEDI scenarios should be set so that (1)under prosperous business cycles they are 29% and 14%; (2)under steady business cycles 83% and 42%; (3)under sluggish business cycles 510% and 255%, respectively. In addition, when shipping companies follow the emission cap guidelines, the CBR in 2050 for vessels in both scenarios will be (1)37.52% and 47.45% during prosperous business cycles; (2)43.49% and 45.65%during steady business cycles; (3)and 53.60% and 53.83% during sluggish business cycles, respectively. The results indicate that during prosperous business cycles, although the free carbon allowance for shipping companies will be greatly insufficient, their profits will still be higher than during sluggish business cycles.

AB - The CO 2 emissions targets in this study are based on the Paris Agreement, which aims to cut emissions in 2050 to half of the 2005 levels, with a focus on the shipping industry. This study uses data for various kinds of vessels following the guidelines set in the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)and examines emission levels and the results of using different strategies during three different business climates. Carbon allowance allocations and cost benefit ratios (CBR)are included. The results show that the minimal free carbon allowances in 2050 for vessels in keeping with EEDI or non-EEDI scenarios should be set so that (1)under prosperous business cycles they are 29% and 14%; (2)under steady business cycles 83% and 42%; (3)under sluggish business cycles 510% and 255%, respectively. In addition, when shipping companies follow the emission cap guidelines, the CBR in 2050 for vessels in both scenarios will be (1)37.52% and 47.45% during prosperous business cycles; (2)43.49% and 45.65%during steady business cycles; (3)and 53.60% and 53.83% during sluggish business cycles, respectively. The results indicate that during prosperous business cycles, although the free carbon allowance for shipping companies will be greatly insufficient, their profits will still be higher than during sluggish business cycles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065203748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065203748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.215

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.215

M3 - Article

C2 - 31075601

AN - SCOPUS:85065203748

VL - 678

SP - 341

EP - 350

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -