TY - JOUR
T1 - Carbon footprint analysis in the aquaculture industry
T2 - Assessment of an ecological shrimp farm
AU - Chang, Ching Chih
AU - Chang, Kuei Chao
AU - Lin, Wen Chun
AU - Wu, Ming Hsi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - The study uses life cycle assessment to analyze the carbon footprint of an ecological shrimp farm located at Yijhu, Taiwan. The procedural study contains primary and secondary data. The quantization procedure follows the ISO/TS 14067. This study aims to estimate the white shrimp full life cycle carbon footprint using a function unit per kilogram. SimoPro 8.0 is used to calculate the carbon footprint in this study. The results show that the life cycle total carbon footprint of white shrimp is 6.9389 kgCO2e/kg. The top five factors in terms of carbon emissions were as follows: electricity (2.0093 kgCO2e/kg, 29.39%), feed (1.6395 kgCO2e/kg, 23.98%), indirect raw materials (1.4782 kgCO2e/kg, 21.62%), waste treatment (0.7783 kgCO2e/kg, 11.40%) and transport and refrigerant (0.7524 kgCO2e/kg, 11.01%). The results showed that wastewater treatment is one of the emission hotspots over the whole life cycle. To conclude, the carbon footprint of the shrimp supply chain can be reduced by employing energy-conserving technology, by utilizing simple wastewater treatment procedures, and by using territorial plants as feed, and such moves could help this industry achieve its goals with regard to a sustainable environment.
AB - The study uses life cycle assessment to analyze the carbon footprint of an ecological shrimp farm located at Yijhu, Taiwan. The procedural study contains primary and secondary data. The quantization procedure follows the ISO/TS 14067. This study aims to estimate the white shrimp full life cycle carbon footprint using a function unit per kilogram. SimoPro 8.0 is used to calculate the carbon footprint in this study. The results show that the life cycle total carbon footprint of white shrimp is 6.9389 kgCO2e/kg. The top five factors in terms of carbon emissions were as follows: electricity (2.0093 kgCO2e/kg, 29.39%), feed (1.6395 kgCO2e/kg, 23.98%), indirect raw materials (1.4782 kgCO2e/kg, 21.62%), waste treatment (0.7783 kgCO2e/kg, 11.40%) and transport and refrigerant (0.7524 kgCO2e/kg, 11.01%). The results showed that wastewater treatment is one of the emission hotspots over the whole life cycle. To conclude, the carbon footprint of the shrimp supply chain can be reduced by employing energy-conserving technology, by utilizing simple wastewater treatment procedures, and by using territorial plants as feed, and such moves could help this industry achieve its goals with regard to a sustainable environment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030681763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030681763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.109
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.109
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85030681763
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 168
SP - 1101
EP - 1107
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
ER -