TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Assessment of Hydrothermal Gasification and Anaerobic Digestion using Aspen Plus and SuperPro
AU - Ballenghien, David
AU - Kempegowda, Rajesh S.
AU - Chen, Wei Hsin
AU - Tran, Khanh Quang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences.
PY - 2024/4/11
Y1 - 2024/4/11
N2 - Wet biomass is gaining increasing attention as an energy source globally. Various wet biomass materials like macroalgae, microalgae, sewage sludge, cattle manures, and food waste, are of high moisture contents, typically around 70% or more. There are two routes of high potential for converting these wet biomasss resoures to gaeous fuel, which are biomethanation and supercritical water gasification (SCWG). Biomethanation is conversion of wet-organic residues to biogas using via anaerobic digestion process. SCWG is a thermochemical conversion process, taking place in supercritical water producing enriched CH4 and H2 gases. In this study, the two processes are comperatively investigated using different process simulation softwares. Aspen Plus was employed for SCWG, while the biomethanation process was simulated with SuperPro. Various raw materials were used as input. We calculated the energy efficiency of the biomethanation process using experimental yields from the literature. For the SCWG process, we determined the higher heating value based on the simulated composition of the methane-enriched gas. Additionally, we conducted an economic analysis to compare the two processes, taking into consideration specific criteria relevant to the Norwegian context.
AB - Wet biomass is gaining increasing attention as an energy source globally. Various wet biomass materials like macroalgae, microalgae, sewage sludge, cattle manures, and food waste, are of high moisture contents, typically around 70% or more. There are two routes of high potential for converting these wet biomasss resoures to gaeous fuel, which are biomethanation and supercritical water gasification (SCWG). Biomethanation is conversion of wet-organic residues to biogas using via anaerobic digestion process. SCWG is a thermochemical conversion process, taking place in supercritical water producing enriched CH4 and H2 gases. In this study, the two processes are comperatively investigated using different process simulation softwares. Aspen Plus was employed for SCWG, while the biomethanation process was simulated with SuperPro. Various raw materials were used as input. We calculated the energy efficiency of the biomethanation process using experimental yields from the literature. For the SCWG process, we determined the higher heating value based on the simulated composition of the methane-enriched gas. Additionally, we conducted an economic analysis to compare the two processes, taking into consideration specific criteria relevant to the Norwegian context.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192270134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85192270134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/e3sconf/202451403003
DO - 10.1051/e3sconf/202451403003
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85192270134
SN - 2555-0403
VL - 514
JO - E3S Web of Conferences
JF - E3S Web of Conferences
M1 - 03003
T2 - 10th International Conference on Environment and Renewable Energy, ICERE 2024
Y2 - 25 February 2024 through 27 February 2024
ER -