TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing immunotherapy effectiveness for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
T2 - infiltrative versus non-infiltrative types in real-world settings
AU - Chiang, Chien Ming
AU - Huang, Kuan Kai
AU - Lee, Chun Te
AU - Hong, Tzu Chun
AU - Wu, Juei Seng
AU - Wu, Hung Tsung
AU - Chang, Ting Tsung
AU - Liu, Yi Sheng
AU - Chen, Wei Ting
AU - Wang, Chung Teng
AU - Chang, Chen
AU - Chen, Po Jun
AU - Hsieh, Ming Tsung
AU - Chen, Chiung Yu
AU - Chuang, Chiao Hsiung
AU - Lee, Ching Chi
AU - Lin, Sheng Hsiang
AU - Lin, Yih Jyh
AU - Kuo, Hsin Yu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2025.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Background: Infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often associated with an unfavorable prognosis, posing a challenge in determining the optimal therapeutic approach. Immunotherapy, employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has become a preferred first-line treatment for advanced HCC. However, the overall effectiveness of ICIs in patients with infiltrative HCC remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effect of ICI treatment on clinical outcomes between patients with infiltrative and non-infiltrative HCC. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort consisting of unresectable HCC patients who underwent immunotherapy with ICIs, categorized into infiltrative and non-infiltrative groups was studied. Primary outcomes comprised treatment response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 198 patients, 60 (30.3%) had infiltrative HCC, while 138 (69.7%) had non-infiltrative HCC. In the infiltrative group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 36.7% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 55.0%. For the non-infiltrative group, the ORR was 33.3% and the DCR was 56.5%, showing no significant difference between the two groups. However, patients in the infiltrative group had significantly shorter median of PFS and OS following immunotherapy, with a PFS of 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.5–6.7; p = 0.0409) and an OS of 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.7–14.4; p = 0.0268), compared with the non-infiltrative group, which had a PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.2–7.6) and an OS of 17.0 months (95% CI: 12.8–21.8). Conclusion: For immunotherapy, infiltrative HCC exhibits treatment responses similar to non-infiltrative HCC. Nonetheless, infiltrative HCC is associated with shorter survival outcomes, compared with non-infiltrative type. Our findings emphasize the essential of considering type discrepancies when developing management strategies for immunotherapy.
AB - Background: Infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often associated with an unfavorable prognosis, posing a challenge in determining the optimal therapeutic approach. Immunotherapy, employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has become a preferred first-line treatment for advanced HCC. However, the overall effectiveness of ICIs in patients with infiltrative HCC remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effect of ICI treatment on clinical outcomes between patients with infiltrative and non-infiltrative HCC. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort consisting of unresectable HCC patients who underwent immunotherapy with ICIs, categorized into infiltrative and non-infiltrative groups was studied. Primary outcomes comprised treatment response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 198 patients, 60 (30.3%) had infiltrative HCC, while 138 (69.7%) had non-infiltrative HCC. In the infiltrative group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 36.7% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 55.0%. For the non-infiltrative group, the ORR was 33.3% and the DCR was 56.5%, showing no significant difference between the two groups. However, patients in the infiltrative group had significantly shorter median of PFS and OS following immunotherapy, with a PFS of 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.5–6.7; p = 0.0409) and an OS of 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.7–14.4; p = 0.0268), compared with the non-infiltrative group, which had a PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.2–7.6) and an OS of 17.0 months (95% CI: 12.8–21.8). Conclusion: For immunotherapy, infiltrative HCC exhibits treatment responses similar to non-infiltrative HCC. Nonetheless, infiltrative HCC is associated with shorter survival outcomes, compared with non-infiltrative type. Our findings emphasize the essential of considering type discrepancies when developing management strategies for immunotherapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215117193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85215117193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17588359241312141
DO - 10.1177/17588359241312141
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85215117193
SN - 1758-8340
VL - 17
JO - Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
JF - Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
ER -