Comparison of objective muscle strength in C5-C6 and C5-C7 brachial plexus injury patients after double nerve transfer

Yi Jung Tsai, Fong Chin Su, Chih Kun Hsiao, Yuan Kun Tu

研究成果: Article

10 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantitative muscle strength to distinguish the outcomes of different injury levels in upper arm type brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients with double nerve transfer. Methods: Nine patients with C5-C6 lesions (age532.2613.9 year old) and nine patients with C5-C7 lesions (age532.467.9 year old) received neurotization of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve combined with the Oberlin procedure (fascicles of ulnar nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve) were recruited. The average time interval between operation and evaluation were 27.3±21.0 and 26.9±20.6 months for C5-C6 and C5-C7, respectively. British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scores and the objective strength measured by a handheld dynamometer were evaluated in multiple muscles to compare outcomes between C5-C6 and C5-C7 injuries. Results: There were no significant differences in BMRC scores between the groups. C5-C6 BPI patients had greater quantitative strength in shoulder flexor (P=0.02), shoulder extensor (P<0.01), elbow flexor (P=0.04), elbow extensor (P=0.04), wrist extensor (P=0.04), and hand grip (P=0.04) than C5-C7 BPI patients. Conclusions: Upper arm type BPI patients have a good motor recovery after double nerve transfer. The different outcomes between C5-C6 and C5-C7 BPI patients appeared in muscles responding to hand grip, wrist extension, and sagittal movements in shoulder and elbow joints.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)107-114
頁數8
期刊Microsurgery
35
發行號2
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 2015 二月 1

指紋

Arm Injuries
Nerve Transfer
Brachial Plexus
Muscle Strength
Arm
Hand Strength
Elbow
Wrist
Biomedical Research
Hand
Musculocutaneous Nerve
Accessory Nerve
Elbow Joint
Muscles
Shoulder Joint
Ulnar Nerve
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

引用此文

@article{48bc052e29894f989d6d7f7108e3cc74,
title = "Comparison of objective muscle strength in C5-C6 and C5-C7 brachial plexus injury patients after double nerve transfer",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantitative muscle strength to distinguish the outcomes of different injury levels in upper arm type brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients with double nerve transfer. Methods: Nine patients with C5-C6 lesions (age532.2613.9 year old) and nine patients with C5-C7 lesions (age532.467.9 year old) received neurotization of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve combined with the Oberlin procedure (fascicles of ulnar nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve) were recruited. The average time interval between operation and evaluation were 27.3±21.0 and 26.9±20.6 months for C5-C6 and C5-C7, respectively. British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scores and the objective strength measured by a handheld dynamometer were evaluated in multiple muscles to compare outcomes between C5-C6 and C5-C7 injuries. Results: There were no significant differences in BMRC scores between the groups. C5-C6 BPI patients had greater quantitative strength in shoulder flexor (P=0.02), shoulder extensor (P<0.01), elbow flexor (P=0.04), elbow extensor (P=0.04), wrist extensor (P=0.04), and hand grip (P=0.04) than C5-C7 BPI patients. Conclusions: Upper arm type BPI patients have a good motor recovery after double nerve transfer. The different outcomes between C5-C6 and C5-C7 BPI patients appeared in muscles responding to hand grip, wrist extension, and sagittal movements in shoulder and elbow joints.",
author = "Tsai, {Yi Jung} and Su, {Fong Chin} and Hsiao, {Chih Kun} and Tu, {Yuan Kun}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/micr.22283",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "107--114",
journal = "Microsurgery",
issn = "0738-1085",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Comparison of objective muscle strength in C5-C6 and C5-C7 brachial plexus injury patients after double nerve transfer. / Tsai, Yi Jung; Su, Fong Chin; Hsiao, Chih Kun; Tu, Yuan Kun.

於: Microsurgery, 卷 35, 編號 2, 01.02.2015, p. 107-114.

研究成果: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of objective muscle strength in C5-C6 and C5-C7 brachial plexus injury patients after double nerve transfer

AU - Tsai, Yi Jung

AU - Su, Fong Chin

AU - Hsiao, Chih Kun

AU - Tu, Yuan Kun

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantitative muscle strength to distinguish the outcomes of different injury levels in upper arm type brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients with double nerve transfer. Methods: Nine patients with C5-C6 lesions (age532.2613.9 year old) and nine patients with C5-C7 lesions (age532.467.9 year old) received neurotization of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve combined with the Oberlin procedure (fascicles of ulnar nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve) were recruited. The average time interval between operation and evaluation were 27.3±21.0 and 26.9±20.6 months for C5-C6 and C5-C7, respectively. British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scores and the objective strength measured by a handheld dynamometer were evaluated in multiple muscles to compare outcomes between C5-C6 and C5-C7 injuries. Results: There were no significant differences in BMRC scores between the groups. C5-C6 BPI patients had greater quantitative strength in shoulder flexor (P=0.02), shoulder extensor (P<0.01), elbow flexor (P=0.04), elbow extensor (P=0.04), wrist extensor (P=0.04), and hand grip (P=0.04) than C5-C7 BPI patients. Conclusions: Upper arm type BPI patients have a good motor recovery after double nerve transfer. The different outcomes between C5-C6 and C5-C7 BPI patients appeared in muscles responding to hand grip, wrist extension, and sagittal movements in shoulder and elbow joints.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantitative muscle strength to distinguish the outcomes of different injury levels in upper arm type brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients with double nerve transfer. Methods: Nine patients with C5-C6 lesions (age532.2613.9 year old) and nine patients with C5-C7 lesions (age532.467.9 year old) received neurotization of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve combined with the Oberlin procedure (fascicles of ulnar nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve) were recruited. The average time interval between operation and evaluation were 27.3±21.0 and 26.9±20.6 months for C5-C6 and C5-C7, respectively. British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scores and the objective strength measured by a handheld dynamometer were evaluated in multiple muscles to compare outcomes between C5-C6 and C5-C7 injuries. Results: There were no significant differences in BMRC scores between the groups. C5-C6 BPI patients had greater quantitative strength in shoulder flexor (P=0.02), shoulder extensor (P<0.01), elbow flexor (P=0.04), elbow extensor (P=0.04), wrist extensor (P=0.04), and hand grip (P=0.04) than C5-C7 BPI patients. Conclusions: Upper arm type BPI patients have a good motor recovery after double nerve transfer. The different outcomes between C5-C6 and C5-C7 BPI patients appeared in muscles responding to hand grip, wrist extension, and sagittal movements in shoulder and elbow joints.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923693468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923693468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/micr.22283

DO - 10.1002/micr.22283

M3 - Article

C2 - 24934721

AN - SCOPUS:84923693468

VL - 35

SP - 107

EP - 114

JO - Microsurgery

JF - Microsurgery

SN - 0738-1085

IS - 2

ER -