TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of two methods for computing abduction moment arms of the rotator cuff
AU - Hughes, Richard E.
AU - Niebur, Glen
AU - Liu, Jain
AU - An, Kai Nan
PY - 1997/5/12
Y1 - 1997/5/12
N2 - Biomechanical models of the shoulder mechanism require estimates of muscle moment arm magnitude. Some shoulder models have estimated muscle moment arms by assuming an idealized minimum distance path from the origin to insertion that passes around the bony geometry. Alternatively, the principle of virtual work can be used to estimate moment arms from tendon excursion and joint-angle data. The purpose of this study was to determine if these two methods give different estimates of abduction moment arms for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis muscles. Muscle moment arms were estimated for these muscles on ten fresh frozen cadaver specimens. The results showed a significant difference between the two estimation methods. Average differences were 3.1 mm (10.6%), 3.9 mm (43.9%), and 7.2 mm (70.3%) for the supraspinatus, subscapularis, and infraspinatus muscles, respectively. These results suggest that shoulder models based on the origin-insertion method may give higher rotator cuff muscle force estimates than methods using the slope of the tendon excursion vs joint angle relationship.
AB - Biomechanical models of the shoulder mechanism require estimates of muscle moment arm magnitude. Some shoulder models have estimated muscle moment arms by assuming an idealized minimum distance path from the origin to insertion that passes around the bony geometry. Alternatively, the principle of virtual work can be used to estimate moment arms from tendon excursion and joint-angle data. The purpose of this study was to determine if these two methods give different estimates of abduction moment arms for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis muscles. Muscle moment arms were estimated for these muscles on ten fresh frozen cadaver specimens. The results showed a significant difference between the two estimation methods. Average differences were 3.1 mm (10.6%), 3.9 mm (43.9%), and 7.2 mm (70.3%) for the supraspinatus, subscapularis, and infraspinatus muscles, respectively. These results suggest that shoulder models based on the origin-insertion method may give higher rotator cuff muscle force estimates than methods using the slope of the tendon excursion vs joint angle relationship.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345367427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345367427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00113-9
DO - 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00113-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 9593209
AN - SCOPUS:0345367427
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 31
SP - 157
EP - 160
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 2
ER -