Cross country analysis of land use planning on earthquake prone area

Hsueh Sheng Chang, Tzu Ling Chen

研究成果: Article

摘要

Structural measures change risk environment into safer place and such improvements leave a secure impression. With large scale of earthquake disasters, structural measures might provide limited against effect. Relatively, non-structural engineering measures such as land use plan receive increasing attention by controlling development location, type and intensity and to physically lead new development away from risk area but safer places. Although the faith and confidence of land use planning on disaster mitigation are challenged by the public, both America and New Zealand have identified and regulated land use planning on active fault zone. Currently, the regulations of direct, indirect and information disclosure on seismic disaster in Taiwan are too general, and it is necessary to take disaster risks into consideration while approving development plans. Therefore, this study refers to disaster mitigation land use planning experiences in America and New Zealand to conduct a comparative analysis on land use planning and related acts. This study might be suitable referred to future disaster mitigation land use plan in Taiwan.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)137-152
頁數16
期刊Journal of Architecture and Planning
17
發行號2-3
出版狀態Published - 2016 一月 1

指紋

land use planning
Land use
Disasters
disaster
Earthquakes
natural disaster
land use
Planning
earthquake
planning
mitigation
Taiwan
New Zealand
active fault
faith
analysis
fault zone
confidence
engineering
regulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Architecture
  • Urban Studies

引用此文

@article{39eda9e0d9cb4d6fbf2b7538564a7590,
title = "Cross country analysis of land use planning on earthquake prone area",
abstract = "Structural measures change risk environment into safer place and such improvements leave a secure impression. With large scale of earthquake disasters, structural measures might provide limited against effect. Relatively, non-structural engineering measures such as land use plan receive increasing attention by controlling development location, type and intensity and to physically lead new development away from risk area but safer places. Although the faith and confidence of land use planning on disaster mitigation are challenged by the public, both America and New Zealand have identified and regulated land use planning on active fault zone. Currently, the regulations of direct, indirect and information disclosure on seismic disaster in Taiwan are too general, and it is necessary to take disaster risks into consideration while approving development plans. Therefore, this study refers to disaster mitigation land use planning experiences in America and New Zealand to conduct a comparative analysis on land use planning and related acts. This study might be suitable referred to future disaster mitigation land use plan in Taiwan.",
author = "Chang, {Hsueh Sheng} and Chen, {Tzu Ling}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "137--152",
journal = "Journal of Architecture and Planning",
issn = "1606-8238",
publisher = "College of Architecture and Planning, Chung Hua University",
number = "2-3",

}

Cross country analysis of land use planning on earthquake prone area. / Chang, Hsueh Sheng; Chen, Tzu Ling.

於: Journal of Architecture and Planning, 卷 17, 編號 2-3, 01.01.2016, p. 137-152.

研究成果: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross country analysis of land use planning on earthquake prone area

AU - Chang, Hsueh Sheng

AU - Chen, Tzu Ling

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Structural measures change risk environment into safer place and such improvements leave a secure impression. With large scale of earthquake disasters, structural measures might provide limited against effect. Relatively, non-structural engineering measures such as land use plan receive increasing attention by controlling development location, type and intensity and to physically lead new development away from risk area but safer places. Although the faith and confidence of land use planning on disaster mitigation are challenged by the public, both America and New Zealand have identified and regulated land use planning on active fault zone. Currently, the regulations of direct, indirect and information disclosure on seismic disaster in Taiwan are too general, and it is necessary to take disaster risks into consideration while approving development plans. Therefore, this study refers to disaster mitigation land use planning experiences in America and New Zealand to conduct a comparative analysis on land use planning and related acts. This study might be suitable referred to future disaster mitigation land use plan in Taiwan.

AB - Structural measures change risk environment into safer place and such improvements leave a secure impression. With large scale of earthquake disasters, structural measures might provide limited against effect. Relatively, non-structural engineering measures such as land use plan receive increasing attention by controlling development location, type and intensity and to physically lead new development away from risk area but safer places. Although the faith and confidence of land use planning on disaster mitigation are challenged by the public, both America and New Zealand have identified and regulated land use planning on active fault zone. Currently, the regulations of direct, indirect and information disclosure on seismic disaster in Taiwan are too general, and it is necessary to take disaster risks into consideration while approving development plans. Therefore, this study refers to disaster mitigation land use planning experiences in America and New Zealand to conduct a comparative analysis on land use planning and related acts. This study might be suitable referred to future disaster mitigation land use plan in Taiwan.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047014204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047014204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047014204

VL - 17

SP - 137

EP - 152

JO - Journal of Architecture and Planning

JF - Journal of Architecture and Planning

SN - 1606-8238

IS - 2-3

ER -