TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Patients Without Diabetes With Hemodialysis Using Ultrasonography
T2 - Is It a Useful Adjunctive Tool?
AU - Tu, I. Te
AU - Jou, I. Ming
AU - Ko, Po Yen
AU - Lee, Jung Shun
AU - Kuo, Li Chieh
AU - Li, Chung Yi
AU - Wu, Po Ting
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Chih-Hui Hsu for providing the statistical consulting services from the Biostatistics Consulting Center and the Skeleton Materials and Bio-compatibility Core Lab, Clinical Medicine Research Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and for assistance with this study. We also thank Kuei-Fang Yeh and Yu-Ying Chen for their valuable administrative assistance. Supported by the Taiwan National Science Council (grants: MOST 107-2314-B-006-065-MY3, MOST 108-2314-B-650-007, MOST 110-2622-E-006-023, MOST 110-2314-B-006-022) and National Cheng Kung University (grants: NCKUEDA 10903, NCKUEDA 110006).
Funding Information:
Supported by the Taiwan National Science Council (grants: MOST 107-2314-B-006-065-MY3, MOST 108-2314-B-650-007, MOST 110-2622-E-006-023, MOST 110-2314-B-006-022) and National Cheng Kung University (grants: NCKUEDA 10903, NCKUEDA 110006).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Objective: (1) To examine the ultrasonography (US) characteristics in patients with hemodialysis-related carpal tunnel syndrome (H-CTS) and (2) to evaluate the accuracy of a proposed US parameter-dynamic ratio of median nerve-to-hamate hook distance (RMHD) in diagnosis of H-CTS. Design: A case-control study. Setting: A tertiary medical center and a secondary hospital from November 2017 to March 2021. Participants: Consecutive patients (N=207) without diabetes under hemodialysis were recruited and divided into a hemodialysis without carpel tunnel syndrome (CTS) (H-Control) group and an H-CTS group. Age-matched volunteers (N=89) without diabetes or upper extremity disorders were enrolled as the control group. Intervention: US examinations by 2 operators blinded to the patient's clinical information. Main Outcome Measures: US parameters including cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet (CSA-I) and outlet (CSA-O), the flattening ratio of the median nerve at the inlet (FR-I) and outlet (FR-O), and RMHD. Results: Handedness and arteriovenous fistula showed no associations with CSA-I/O and FR-I/O. Compared with the control group (n=69), the CSA-I was significantly larger in the H-Control group (n=63) and H-CTS group (n=76) (P<.001, both). There were no significant differences in the FR-I/-O among the 3 groups. For the second aim, in the H-CTS group (n=38), there was a significantly lower RMHD compared with both the control (n=20) and H-Control groups (n=30) (0.1%±2.2% vs 3.5±2.3% and 3.8±1.7%, P<.001, both). An RMHD cutoff value of <2.7% yielded a specificity of 80.0%, a sensitivity of 94.7%, and an overall accuracy of 88.2% in the diagnosis of H-CTS. Conclusions: Neither CSA-I/-O or FR-I/-O have a role in the diagnosis of H-CTS. RMHD might be a useful US parameter in the diagnosis of CTS in patients without diabetes undergoing hemodialysis.
AB - Objective: (1) To examine the ultrasonography (US) characteristics in patients with hemodialysis-related carpal tunnel syndrome (H-CTS) and (2) to evaluate the accuracy of a proposed US parameter-dynamic ratio of median nerve-to-hamate hook distance (RMHD) in diagnosis of H-CTS. Design: A case-control study. Setting: A tertiary medical center and a secondary hospital from November 2017 to March 2021. Participants: Consecutive patients (N=207) without diabetes under hemodialysis were recruited and divided into a hemodialysis without carpel tunnel syndrome (CTS) (H-Control) group and an H-CTS group. Age-matched volunteers (N=89) without diabetes or upper extremity disorders were enrolled as the control group. Intervention: US examinations by 2 operators blinded to the patient's clinical information. Main Outcome Measures: US parameters including cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet (CSA-I) and outlet (CSA-O), the flattening ratio of the median nerve at the inlet (FR-I) and outlet (FR-O), and RMHD. Results: Handedness and arteriovenous fistula showed no associations with CSA-I/O and FR-I/O. Compared with the control group (n=69), the CSA-I was significantly larger in the H-Control group (n=63) and H-CTS group (n=76) (P<.001, both). There were no significant differences in the FR-I/-O among the 3 groups. For the second aim, in the H-CTS group (n=38), there was a significantly lower RMHD compared with both the control (n=20) and H-Control groups (n=30) (0.1%±2.2% vs 3.5±2.3% and 3.8±1.7%, P<.001, both). An RMHD cutoff value of <2.7% yielded a specificity of 80.0%, a sensitivity of 94.7%, and an overall accuracy of 88.2% in the diagnosis of H-CTS. Conclusions: Neither CSA-I/-O or FR-I/-O have a role in the diagnosis of H-CTS. RMHD might be a useful US parameter in the diagnosis of CTS in patients without diabetes undergoing hemodialysis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123725390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123725390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.11.007
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.11.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 34922930
AN - SCOPUS:85123725390
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 103
SP - 1551
EP - 1557
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 8
ER -