TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences in the association between glycemia and uric acid levels in diabetic and non-diabetic populations
AU - Kuo, Kuan Ting
AU - Chang, Yin Fan
AU - Wu, I. Hsuan
AU - Lu, Feng Hwa
AU - Yang, Yi Ching
AU - Wu, Jin Shang
AU - Chang, Chih Jen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Aims: Our study aimed to investigate the influence of different glycemic statuses and their fasting plasma glucose/2-hour post-load glucose on uric acid level. Methods: A total of 14,787 subjects were recruited after excluding subjects with medication for hyperuricemia or diabetes. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour post-load glucose (2hPG), and uric acid (UA) were measured. Then, subjects were divided into normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and diabetes. Results: After adjustment for clinical variables, in NGT group, there was no significant relationship found between UA level and FPG. However, there was a positive association between UA level and 2hPG (β = 0.003, 95% CI: 0.002~0.004). A similar trend was also observed between UA level and 2hPG in IFG group (β = 0.004, 95% CI: 0.000~0.009) and IGT group (β = 0.005, 95% CI: 0.002~0.008), but relationship between UA level and FPG remained insignificant. In diabetes group, UA level was negatively associated with both FPG (β = −0.008, 95% CI: −0.010 ~ −0.007) and 2hPG (β = −0.005, 95% CI: −0.006 ~−0.003). Conclusions: In non-diabetic individuals, UA level increased with 2hPG, but not with FPG, and UA level was inversely associated with both FPG and 2hPG in diabetic population.
AB - Aims: Our study aimed to investigate the influence of different glycemic statuses and their fasting plasma glucose/2-hour post-load glucose on uric acid level. Methods: A total of 14,787 subjects were recruited after excluding subjects with medication for hyperuricemia or diabetes. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour post-load glucose (2hPG), and uric acid (UA) were measured. Then, subjects were divided into normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and diabetes. Results: After adjustment for clinical variables, in NGT group, there was no significant relationship found between UA level and FPG. However, there was a positive association between UA level and 2hPG (β = 0.003, 95% CI: 0.002~0.004). A similar trend was also observed between UA level and 2hPG in IFG group (β = 0.004, 95% CI: 0.000~0.009) and IGT group (β = 0.005, 95% CI: 0.002~0.008), but relationship between UA level and FPG remained insignificant. In diabetes group, UA level was negatively associated with both FPG (β = −0.008, 95% CI: −0.010 ~ −0.007) and 2hPG (β = −0.005, 95% CI: −0.006 ~−0.003). Conclusions: In non-diabetic individuals, UA level increased with 2hPG, but not with FPG, and UA level was inversely associated with both FPG and 2hPG in diabetic population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066611233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066611233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.05.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.05.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 31176544
AN - SCOPUS:85066611233
SN - 1056-8727
VL - 33
SP - 511
EP - 515
JO - Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
JF - Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
IS - 8
ER -