TY - JOUR
T1 - Direct Iterative Procedures for Consensus Building with Additive Preference Relations Based on the Discrete Assessment Scale
AU - Wu, Zhibin
AU - Xiao, Jie
AU - Palomares, Ivan
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71671118.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Individual consistency and group consensus are both important when seeking reliable and satisfying solutions for group decision making (GDM) problems using additive preference relations (APRs). In this paper, two new algorithms are proposed to facilitate the consensus reaching process, the first of which is used to improve the individual consistency level, and the second of which is designed to assist the group to achieve a predefined consensus level. Unlike previous GDM studies for consistency and consensus building, the proposed algorithms are essentially heuristic, modify only some of the elements in APRs to reduce the number of preference modifications in the consistency and consensus process, and have modified preferences that belong to the original evaluation scale to make the generated suggestions easier to understand. In particular, the consensus algorithm ensures that the individual consistency level is still acceptable when the predefined consensus level is achieved. Finally, classical examples and simulations are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.
AB - Individual consistency and group consensus are both important when seeking reliable and satisfying solutions for group decision making (GDM) problems using additive preference relations (APRs). In this paper, two new algorithms are proposed to facilitate the consensus reaching process, the first of which is used to improve the individual consistency level, and the second of which is designed to assist the group to achieve a predefined consensus level. Unlike previous GDM studies for consistency and consensus building, the proposed algorithms are essentially heuristic, modify only some of the elements in APRs to reduce the number of preference modifications in the consistency and consensus process, and have modified preferences that belong to the original evaluation scale to make the generated suggestions easier to understand. In particular, the consensus algorithm ensures that the individual consistency level is still acceptable when the predefined consensus level is achieved. Finally, classical examples and simulations are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073824707&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073824707&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10726-019-09636-3
DO - 10.1007/s10726-019-09636-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073824707
SN - 0926-2644
VL - 28
SP - 1167
EP - 1191
JO - Group Decision and Negotiation
JF - Group Decision and Negotiation
IS - 6
ER -