TY - JOUR
T1 - Distal upper extremity function following proximal humeral resection and reconstruction for tumors
T2 - Contralateral comparison
AU - Damron, Timothy A.
AU - Rock, Michael G.
AU - O'Connor, Mary I.
AU - Johnson, Marjorie E.
AU - An, Kai Nan
AU - Pritchard, Douglas J.
AU - Sim, Franklin H.
AU - Shives, Thomas C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgment: Funding for patient follow-up was provided by Grants CA 40583 and CA 23751 from the National Cancer Institute and by funds from the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Background: Most functional analyses after limb salvage operations about the shoulder have focused on proximal function with the assumption that distal function is largely unaffected. This analysis examines distal function objectively. Methods: Objective laboratory data regarding distal upper extremity strength after reconstructive procedures for tumors near the shoulder joint was collected over a 16-year period. Thirty-two patients were able to participate fully in the data collection at an average most recent follow-up duration of >3.5 years. Results: Statistically significant reductions on the involved side compared with the uninvolved side in grip, forearm pronation, forearm supination, elbow flexion, and elbow extension strength were documented (p < 0.05). The magnitude of reduction in strength diminishes distally, with the greatest effect in this group of patients being observed in elbow extension, followed by elbow flexion, forearm supination, and forearm pronation. Grip strength consistently showed the least amount of strength reduction compared with the uninvolved side, even within resection and reconstruction groups. Subjective patient rating of dexterity was no less than 3 of 5. Ninety percent of patients rated their dexterity 4 of 5 (52%) or 5 of 5 (38%). Conclusions: Despite the insistence of "normal" function in the distal upper extremity after limb salvage procedures, complete normality is not maintained. However, the degree of maintenance of distal function appears to be high, especially for grip strength and forearm pronation strength, and patient satisfaction is acceptable. Published by Lippincott-Raven Publishers
AB - Background: Most functional analyses after limb salvage operations about the shoulder have focused on proximal function with the assumption that distal function is largely unaffected. This analysis examines distal function objectively. Methods: Objective laboratory data regarding distal upper extremity strength after reconstructive procedures for tumors near the shoulder joint was collected over a 16-year period. Thirty-two patients were able to participate fully in the data collection at an average most recent follow-up duration of >3.5 years. Results: Statistically significant reductions on the involved side compared with the uninvolved side in grip, forearm pronation, forearm supination, elbow flexion, and elbow extension strength were documented (p < 0.05). The magnitude of reduction in strength diminishes distally, with the greatest effect in this group of patients being observed in elbow extension, followed by elbow flexion, forearm supination, and forearm pronation. Grip strength consistently showed the least amount of strength reduction compared with the uninvolved side, even within resection and reconstruction groups. Subjective patient rating of dexterity was no less than 3 of 5. Ninety percent of patients rated their dexterity 4 of 5 (52%) or 5 of 5 (38%). Conclusions: Despite the insistence of "normal" function in the distal upper extremity after limb salvage procedures, complete normality is not maintained. However, the degree of maintenance of distal function appears to be high, especially for grip strength and forearm pronation strength, and patient satisfaction is acceptable. Published by Lippincott-Raven Publishers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031113464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031113464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF02306616
DO - 10.1007/BF02306616
M3 - Article
C2 - 9142385
AN - SCOPUS:0031113464
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 4
SP - 237
EP - 246
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -