網路同儕互評與評量標準來源對批判思考能力之影響

研究成果: Article

摘要

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of peer assessment and sources of assessment criteria on elementary school students’ critical thinking within a web-based learning environment. Participants were 87 fifth-graders from three classes from one elementary school in Kaohsiung county. Three intact groups were randomly assigned to 3 different treatment conditions, namely Treatment A (Without peer assessment), Treatment B (Peer assessment using teacher’s provided criteria) and Treatment C (Peer assessment using students’ constructed criteria), to interact with a web-based question-posing and peer assessment learning system for nine consecutive weeks. To examine the mediating effects of measuring time and different learning strategies (i.e., peer assessment and sources of assessment criteria) on critical thinking, a 3 x 2 mixed experimental research design was adopted. The results indicated that students participating in both peer assessment treatment conditions performed significantly better than those in the without peer assessment condition on posttest of critical thinking. It also showed that students participating in the peer assessment using students’ constructed criteria group performed significantly better than those participating in the peer assessment with teacher’s provided criteria group on posttest of critical thinking. Suggestions for classroom implementation and future research topics in peer assessment are proposed.
貢獻的翻譯標題Effects of Peer Assessment and Sources of Assessment Criteria on Critical Thinking Within a Web-Based Learning Environment
原文Chinese
頁(從 - 到)1-21
期刊南大學報
37
發行號2
出版狀態Published - 2003

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

指紋 深入研究「網路同儕互評與評量標準來源對批判思考能力之影響」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

  • 引用此