En Bloc Stapling of Renal Hilum During Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Nephroureterectomy in Dialysis Patients

Jiann-Hui Ou, Wen-Horng Yang, Tzong Shin Tzai

研究成果: Article

6 引文 (Scopus)

摘要

Objectives: To report our experience in routine en bloc stapling of the renal hilum during hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy in dialysis patients. Methods: From October 2003 to June 2006, hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma was performed in 23 dialysis patients. En bloc mass stapling of the renal pedicle with an endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis (Endo-GIA) stapler without individual dissection of the renal artery and vein was done. Results: All procedures were successful. No hilar bleeding was encountered during the process of hilar division. The overall success rate of en bloc stapling to control the renal hilum in the 23 patients was 100%. The average patient age was 59.0 years (range 32-78), the operative time was 177.3 minutes (range 135-343), and the estimated blood loss was 117 mL (range 50-500). The time to oral intake and ambulation was 2.0 and 3.1 days, respectively. Two patients had postoperative complications, one pneumonia and the other wound hematoma. No immediate or short-term complications were related to this method of en bloc hilar division. No case of symptoms or imaging findings of arteriovenous fistula had developed at a mean follow-up of 24.5 months. No statistically significant difference was found in preoperative and postoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions: Routine use of en bloc stapling and division of the renal pedicle in dialysis patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma is safe. Without separating the renal artery from the vein with the laparoscopic instrument, the risk of hilar bleeding can be avoided.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)589-592
頁數4
期刊Urology
72
發行號3
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 2008 九月 1

指紋

Dialysis
Hand
Kidney
Renal Veins
Transitional Cell Carcinoma
Renal Artery
Hemorrhage
Blood Pressure
Arteriovenous Fistula
Operative Time
Urinary Tract
Hematoma
Walking
Dissection
Pneumonia
Urinary Bladder
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

引用此文

@article{c42c4d98467c4a1780d264784ecd8139,
title = "En Bloc Stapling of Renal Hilum During Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Nephroureterectomy in Dialysis Patients",
abstract = "Objectives: To report our experience in routine en bloc stapling of the renal hilum during hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy in dialysis patients. Methods: From October 2003 to June 2006, hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma was performed in 23 dialysis patients. En bloc mass stapling of the renal pedicle with an endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis (Endo-GIA) stapler without individual dissection of the renal artery and vein was done. Results: All procedures were successful. No hilar bleeding was encountered during the process of hilar division. The overall success rate of en bloc stapling to control the renal hilum in the 23 patients was 100{\%}. The average patient age was 59.0 years (range 32-78), the operative time was 177.3 minutes (range 135-343), and the estimated blood loss was 117 mL (range 50-500). The time to oral intake and ambulation was 2.0 and 3.1 days, respectively. Two patients had postoperative complications, one pneumonia and the other wound hematoma. No immediate or short-term complications were related to this method of en bloc hilar division. No case of symptoms or imaging findings of arteriovenous fistula had developed at a mean follow-up of 24.5 months. No statistically significant difference was found in preoperative and postoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions: Routine use of en bloc stapling and division of the renal pedicle in dialysis patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma is safe. Without separating the renal artery from the vein with the laparoscopic instrument, the risk of hilar bleeding can be avoided.",
author = "Jiann-Hui Ou and Wen-Horng Yang and Tzai, {Tzong Shin}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.018",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "589--592",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - En Bloc Stapling of Renal Hilum During Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Nephroureterectomy in Dialysis Patients

AU - Ou, Jiann-Hui

AU - Yang, Wen-Horng

AU - Tzai, Tzong Shin

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - Objectives: To report our experience in routine en bloc stapling of the renal hilum during hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy in dialysis patients. Methods: From October 2003 to June 2006, hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma was performed in 23 dialysis patients. En bloc mass stapling of the renal pedicle with an endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis (Endo-GIA) stapler without individual dissection of the renal artery and vein was done. Results: All procedures were successful. No hilar bleeding was encountered during the process of hilar division. The overall success rate of en bloc stapling to control the renal hilum in the 23 patients was 100%. The average patient age was 59.0 years (range 32-78), the operative time was 177.3 minutes (range 135-343), and the estimated blood loss was 117 mL (range 50-500). The time to oral intake and ambulation was 2.0 and 3.1 days, respectively. Two patients had postoperative complications, one pneumonia and the other wound hematoma. No immediate or short-term complications were related to this method of en bloc hilar division. No case of symptoms or imaging findings of arteriovenous fistula had developed at a mean follow-up of 24.5 months. No statistically significant difference was found in preoperative and postoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions: Routine use of en bloc stapling and division of the renal pedicle in dialysis patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma is safe. Without separating the renal artery from the vein with the laparoscopic instrument, the risk of hilar bleeding can be avoided.

AB - Objectives: To report our experience in routine en bloc stapling of the renal hilum during hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy in dialysis patients. Methods: From October 2003 to June 2006, hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma was performed in 23 dialysis patients. En bloc mass stapling of the renal pedicle with an endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis (Endo-GIA) stapler without individual dissection of the renal artery and vein was done. Results: All procedures were successful. No hilar bleeding was encountered during the process of hilar division. The overall success rate of en bloc stapling to control the renal hilum in the 23 patients was 100%. The average patient age was 59.0 years (range 32-78), the operative time was 177.3 minutes (range 135-343), and the estimated blood loss was 117 mL (range 50-500). The time to oral intake and ambulation was 2.0 and 3.1 days, respectively. Two patients had postoperative complications, one pneumonia and the other wound hematoma. No immediate or short-term complications were related to this method of en bloc hilar division. No case of symptoms or imaging findings of arteriovenous fistula had developed at a mean follow-up of 24.5 months. No statistically significant difference was found in preoperative and postoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions: Routine use of en bloc stapling and division of the renal pedicle in dialysis patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma is safe. Without separating the renal artery from the vein with the laparoscopic instrument, the risk of hilar bleeding can be avoided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50249162481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50249162481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.018

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 18639921

AN - SCOPUS:50249162481

VL - 72

SP - 589

EP - 592

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 3

ER -