TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Domains in the Assessment of the Quality of Life in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
AU - Wu, Ching Nung
AU - Wang, Yu Ming
AU - Chen, Wei Chih
AU - Fang, Fu Min
AU - Li, Shau Hsuan
AU - Huang, Tai Lin
AU - Hwang, Chung Feng
AU - Lee, Yu
AU - Lin, Chung Ying
AU - Luo, Sheng Dean
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported, in part, by grants from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Research Program (CORPG8K0101 and CORPG8L0391). However, the funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, publication decision, or manuscript preparation.We appreciate the Biostatistics Center at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for helping with the statistics work. We also appreciate all coworkers in the ENT department for their support in the patient collection.
Funding Information:
This work was supported, in part, by grants from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Research Program (CORPG8K0101 and CORPG8L0391). However, the funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, publication decision, or manuscript preparation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Wu et al.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Few instruments are available for assessing the otorhinologic-related quality of life (QOL) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Therefore, we evaluated whether the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) could be applied to these patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with NPC, who had been treated with standard protocol and followed up in our institute between 2019 and 2022, were invited to join the cross-sectional study during their clinic visits. All participants completed the SNOT-22 and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 once they were recruited. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to decide the most suitable model for the underlying SNOT-22 subdomains, along with various validity and reliability tests. Results: We identified a total of 275 patients, with 84 (30.5%) women and 191 (69.5%) men. The mean age was 54.1 years (standard deviation: 11.2). Among these patients, 171 (62.1%) were in late stages, and 260 (94.5%) received chemoradiotherapy as treatment. The median interval between primary RT treatment and questionnaire completion was 50 months (interquartile range: 29–93). CFA supported a five-factor model for the SNOT-22 for NPC patients, including nasal, ear/facial, sleep, function, and emotion domains. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the SNOT-22 domain score were good. In addition, known-group validity was good for the SNOT-22 total score and domain scores according to the disease recurrence status. Conclusion: Psychometric analyses supported the reliability and validity of a five-domain SNOT-22 for assessing otorhinologic-related QOL in NPC patients.
AB - Background: Few instruments are available for assessing the otorhinologic-related quality of life (QOL) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Therefore, we evaluated whether the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) could be applied to these patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with NPC, who had been treated with standard protocol and followed up in our institute between 2019 and 2022, were invited to join the cross-sectional study during their clinic visits. All participants completed the SNOT-22 and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 once they were recruited. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to decide the most suitable model for the underlying SNOT-22 subdomains, along with various validity and reliability tests. Results: We identified a total of 275 patients, with 84 (30.5%) women and 191 (69.5%) men. The mean age was 54.1 years (standard deviation: 11.2). Among these patients, 171 (62.1%) were in late stages, and 260 (94.5%) received chemoradiotherapy as treatment. The median interval between primary RT treatment and questionnaire completion was 50 months (interquartile range: 29–93). CFA supported a five-factor model for the SNOT-22 for NPC patients, including nasal, ear/facial, sleep, function, and emotion domains. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the SNOT-22 domain score were good. In addition, known-group validity was good for the SNOT-22 total score and domain scores according to the disease recurrence status. Conclusion: Psychometric analyses supported the reliability and validity of a five-domain SNOT-22 for assessing otorhinologic-related QOL in NPC patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165920856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165920856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/CMAR.S416353
DO - 10.2147/CMAR.S416353
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85165920856
SN - 1179-1322
VL - 15
SP - 719
EP - 728
JO - Cancer Management and Research
JF - Cancer Management and Research
ER -