TY - JOUR
T1 - Hematite (α-Fe2O3) quantification in sedimentary magnetism
T2 - limitations of existing proxies and ways forward
AU - Roberts, Andrew P.
AU - Zhao, Xiang
AU - Heslop, David
AU - Abrajevitch, Alexandra
AU - Chen, Yen Hua
AU - Hu, Pengxiang
AU - Jiang, Zhaoxia
AU - Liu, Qingsong
AU - Pillans, Brad J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Determination of hematite contributions to sedimentary magnetizations is an important but difficult task in quantitative environmental studies. The poorly crystalline and fine-grained nature of hematite nanoparticles makes quantification of their concentrations in natural environments challenging using mineralogical and spectroscopic methods, while the weak magnetization of hematite and often significant superparamagnetic nanoparticle concentrations make quantification difficult using magnetic remanence measurements. We demonstrate here that much-used magnetic parameters, such as the S-ratio and ‘hard’ isothermal remanent magnetization (HIRM), tend to significantly underestimate relative and absolute hematite contents, respectively. Unmixing of isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) acquisition curves is among the more suitable approaches for defining magnetic mineral contributions, although it has under-appreciated uncertainties that limit hematite quantification. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and other methods can enable relative hematite and goethite content quantification under some conditions. Combined use of magnetic, mineralogical, and spectroscopic approaches provides valuable cross-checks on estimated hematite contents; such an integrated approach is recommended here. Further work is also needed to rise to the challenge of developing improved methods for hematite quantification.
AB - Determination of hematite contributions to sedimentary magnetizations is an important but difficult task in quantitative environmental studies. The poorly crystalline and fine-grained nature of hematite nanoparticles makes quantification of their concentrations in natural environments challenging using mineralogical and spectroscopic methods, while the weak magnetization of hematite and often significant superparamagnetic nanoparticle concentrations make quantification difficult using magnetic remanence measurements. We demonstrate here that much-used magnetic parameters, such as the S-ratio and ‘hard’ isothermal remanent magnetization (HIRM), tend to significantly underestimate relative and absolute hematite contents, respectively. Unmixing of isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) acquisition curves is among the more suitable approaches for defining magnetic mineral contributions, although it has under-appreciated uncertainties that limit hematite quantification. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and other methods can enable relative hematite and goethite content quantification under some conditions. Combined use of magnetic, mineralogical, and spectroscopic approaches provides valuable cross-checks on estimated hematite contents; such an integrated approach is recommended here. Further work is also needed to rise to the challenge of developing improved methods for hematite quantification.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086506895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086506895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40562-020-00157-5
DO - 10.1186/s40562-020-00157-5
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85086506895
SN - 2196-4092
VL - 7
JO - Geoscience Letters
JF - Geoscience Letters
IS - 1
M1 - 8
ER -