Hematopathologic discrepancies between referral and review diagnoses: A gap between general pathologists and hematopathologists

Chen Chang, Shih Wen Huang, Ih Jen Su, Kung Chao Chang

研究成果: Article同行評審

11 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

The World Health Organization (WHO) lymphoma classification has been widely adopted by hematopathologists. However, its practical application by general pathologists is largely unknown. Using a hematopathology consultation program in Taiwan, we reviewed 406 cases. Diagnostic discrepancies were scored based upon whether the divergence would alter disease management according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Major discrepancies accounted for 55% (222/406), minor discrepancies for 5% (20/406) and agreement for 40% (164/406) cases. The more common groups in major discrepancies were non-diagnostic/ ambiguous referral reports (116/222, 52%), tumor type revisions (52/222, 23%) and changes from malignant to benign lesions (32/222, 14%). In a total of 259 cases of lymphoma, the concordance rates were 41% (77/187) and 33% (24/72) for B-cell and T/natural killer (NK)-cell lymphomas, respectively. It appears that the WHO approach has made lymphoma classification rather poorly reproducible at least in countries where extensive use of an ancillary technique is not employed by general pathologists.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)1023-1030
頁數8
期刊Leukemia and Lymphoma
55
發行號5
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 2014 五月

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • 血液學
  • 腫瘤科
  • 癌症研究

指紋

深入研究「Hematopathologic discrepancies between referral and review diagnoses: A gap between general pathologists and hematopathologists」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此