TY - JOUR
T1 - Hypersonic turbulent expansion-corner flow with shock impingement
AU - Chung, Kung Ming
AU - Lu, Frank K.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was supported by NASA Langley Research Center Grant NAG 1-891, Hampton, Virginia, monitored by J. P. Weidner. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank Gene Sloan and Jim Holland for technical assistance in performing the experiments.
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - Mean and fluctuating surface pressure data were obtained in a Mach 8, turbulent, cold flow past an expansion corner subjected to shock impingement. The expansion corner of 2.5 or 4.25 deg was located at 0.77 m (30.25 in.) from the leading edge of a sharp-edged flat plate, while an external shock, generated by either a 2- or 4- deg sharp wedge, impinged at the corner, or at one boundary-layer thickness ahead or behind the corner. The mean pressure distribution was strongly influenced by the mutual interaction between the shock and the expansion. For example, the upstream influence decreased when the shock impinged downstream of the corner. Also, the unsteadiness of the interactions was characterized by an intermittent region and a local rms pressure peak near the upstream influence. The peak rms pressure fluctuations increased with a larger overall interaction strength. Shock impingement downstream of the corner resulted in lower fluctuation peaks and also in a shorter region of reduced fluctuation levels. These features may be exploited in inlet design by impinging the cowl shock downstream of an expansion corner instead of at the corner. In addition, a limited pitot pressure survey showed a thinning of the boundary layer downstream of the corner.
AB - Mean and fluctuating surface pressure data were obtained in a Mach 8, turbulent, cold flow past an expansion corner subjected to shock impingement. The expansion corner of 2.5 or 4.25 deg was located at 0.77 m (30.25 in.) from the leading edge of a sharp-edged flat plate, while an external shock, generated by either a 2- or 4- deg sharp wedge, impinged at the corner, or at one boundary-layer thickness ahead or behind the corner. The mean pressure distribution was strongly influenced by the mutual interaction between the shock and the expansion. For example, the upstream influence decreased when the shock impinged downstream of the corner. Also, the unsteadiness of the interactions was characterized by an intermittent region and a local rms pressure peak near the upstream influence. The peak rms pressure fluctuations increased with a larger overall interaction strength. Shock impingement downstream of the corner resulted in lower fluctuation peaks and also in a shorter region of reduced fluctuation levels. These features may be exploited in inlet design by impinging the cowl shock downstream of an expansion corner instead of at the corner. In addition, a limited pitot pressure survey showed a thinning of the boundary layer downstream of the corner.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85003369949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85003369949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/3.23863
DO - 10.2514/3.23863
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85003369949
SN - 0748-4658
VL - 11
SP - 441
EP - 447
JO - Journal of Propulsion and Power
JF - Journal of Propulsion and Power
IS - 3
ER -