TY - CONF
T1 - Hypersonic turbulent expansion-corner flow with shock impingement
AU - Chung, Kung Ming
AU - Lu, Frank K.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was supported by NASA Langley Grant NAG 1-891 monitored by Dr. J.P. Weidner. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank hlessrs. Gene Sloan and Jirn IIolland for technical assistance in performing the experiments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 1992 by K.-M. Chung and F.K. Lu.
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - Mean and fluctuating surface pressure data were obtained in a Mach 8, turbulent, cold flow past an expansion comer subjected to shock impingement. The expansion corner of 2.5 or 4.25 deg was located at 0-77 m (30.25 in.) from the leading edge of a sharp-edged flat plate while an external shock, generated by either a 2-or 4-deg sharp wedge, impinged at the corner, or at one boundary layer thickness ahead or behind the corner. The mean pressure distribution was strongly influenced by the mutual interaction between the shock and the expansion. For example, the upstream influence decreased when the shock impinged downstream of the corner. Also, the unsteadiness of the interactions was characterized by an intermittent region and a local rms pressure peak near the upstream influence line. The peak rms pressure fluctuations increased with a larger overall interaction strength. Shock impingement downstream of the corner resulted in lower peaks and also in a shorter region of reduced fluctuation levels. These features may be exploited in inlet design by impinging the cowl shock downstream of an expansion corner instead of at the corner. In addition> a limited Pilot pressure survey showed a thinning of the boundary layer downstream of the corner.
AB - Mean and fluctuating surface pressure data were obtained in a Mach 8, turbulent, cold flow past an expansion comer subjected to shock impingement. The expansion corner of 2.5 or 4.25 deg was located at 0-77 m (30.25 in.) from the leading edge of a sharp-edged flat plate while an external shock, generated by either a 2-or 4-deg sharp wedge, impinged at the corner, or at one boundary layer thickness ahead or behind the corner. The mean pressure distribution was strongly influenced by the mutual interaction between the shock and the expansion. For example, the upstream influence decreased when the shock impinged downstream of the corner. Also, the unsteadiness of the interactions was characterized by an intermittent region and a local rms pressure peak near the upstream influence line. The peak rms pressure fluctuations increased with a larger overall interaction strength. Shock impingement downstream of the corner resulted in lower peaks and also in a shorter region of reduced fluctuation levels. These features may be exploited in inlet design by impinging the cowl shock downstream of an expansion corner instead of at the corner. In addition> a limited Pilot pressure survey showed a thinning of the boundary layer downstream of the corner.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990996805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990996805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.1992-5101
DO - 10.2514/6.1992-5101
M3 - Paper
AN - SCOPUS:84990996805
T2 - 4th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 1992
Y2 - 21 September 1992 through 23 September 1992
ER -