TY - JOUR
T1 - Implantable doppler probes for postoperatively monitoring free flaps
T2 - Efficacy. A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Chang, Tzu Yen
AU - Lee, Yao Chou
AU - Lin, You Cheng
AU - Wong, Stanley Thian Sze
AU - Hsueh, Yuan Yu
AU - Kuo, Yao Lung
AU - Shieh, Shyh Jou
AU - Lee, Jing Wei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Background: Although clinical assessment remains the gold standard for monitoring the circulation of free flaps, several adjunct techniques promote timely salvage by detecting circulation compromise early. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of an implantable Doppler probe for postoperatively monitoring free flaps. Materials and Methods: English-language articles evaluating the efficacy of implantable Doppler probes compared with clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps were analyzed. The outcome measures were total flap failure rates, salvage rates, sensitivity, false-positive rates, and positive likelihood ratios. Results: Of the 504 citations identified, 6 comparative studies were included for meta-analysis. An implantable Doppler probe significantly lowered the flap failure rate (risk ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.75) and raised the successful salvage rate (risk ratio: 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.59). Pooled sensitivity was higher (1.00 vs 0.98), the positive likelihood ratio was lower (72.16 vs 220.48), and the false-positive rate was higher (0.01 vs 0) in the implantable Doppler probe group than in the clinical assessment group. Conclusion: An implantable Doppler probe is significantly more efficacious than clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps.
AB - Background: Although clinical assessment remains the gold standard for monitoring the circulation of free flaps, several adjunct techniques promote timely salvage by detecting circulation compromise early. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of an implantable Doppler probe for postoperatively monitoring free flaps. Materials and Methods: English-language articles evaluating the efficacy of implantable Doppler probes compared with clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps were analyzed. The outcome measures were total flap failure rates, salvage rates, sensitivity, false-positive rates, and positive likelihood ratios. Results: Of the 504 citations identified, 6 comparative studies were included for meta-analysis. An implantable Doppler probe significantly lowered the flap failure rate (risk ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.75) and raised the successful salvage rate (risk ratio: 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.59). Pooled sensitivity was higher (1.00 vs 0.98), the positive likelihood ratio was lower (72.16 vs 220.48), and the false-positive rate was higher (0.01 vs 0) in the implantable Doppler probe group than in the clinical assessment group. Conclusion: An implantable Doppler probe is significantly more efficacious than clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048091361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048091361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001099
DO - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001099
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048091361
SN - 2169-7574
VL - 4
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
IS - 11
M1 - e1099
ER -