In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against Enterobacterales from patients with intra-abdominal infections: Results of the study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) in Taiwan, 2020

Yu Lin Lee, Wen Chien Ko, Po Ren Hsueh

研究成果: Article同行評審

3 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

Background: Multi-drug resistant Enterobacterales is a growing health threat. Imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, are not clinically used in Taiwan and the susceptibility is lack from routine laboratory tests. Methods: Broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints criteria. Isolates that were not susceptible to imipenem (MIC ≥ 2 mg/L), imipenem/relebactam (MIC ≥ 2 mg/L), or ceftolozane-tazobactam (MIC ≥ 4 mg/L) were selected for further molecular testing for genes encoding extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases by multiplex PCR assays. Results: A total of 290 Enterobacterales isolates from 9 participating hospitals were collected in 2020. Escherichia coli (n = 135, 46.6%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 88, 30.3%) were two leading pathogens of all Enterobacterales isolates. The antimicrobial agents with susceptibility rates more than 90% included amikacin (99.3%, 288/290), ertapenem (90.0%, 261/290), meropenem (97.2%, 282/290), imipenem/relebactam (94.8%, 275/290) and meropenem/vaborbactam (99.3%, 288/290). K. pneumoniae isolates were less susceptible to ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam and ceftozolane/tazobactam than E. coli (all p < 0.05). ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemase were detected in 40.5% (17/42), 45.2% (19/42) and 11.9% (5/42) among tested isolates, respectively. The 5 carbapenemase genes included 4 blaKPC and 1 blaIMP. The imipenem-non-susceptible isolates (n = 30) had higher susceptibility rates to meropenem/vaborbactam (93.3%, 28/30) than imipenem/relebactam (50%, 12/30) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam had excellent efficacy against Enterobacterales isolates. Meropenem/vaborbactam allowed better salvage therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)75-83
頁數9
期刊Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
56
發行號1
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 2023 2月

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • 免疫學和過敏
  • 一般免疫學和微生物學
  • 微生物學(醫學)
  • 傳染性疾病

指紋

深入研究「In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against Enterobacterales from patients with intra-abdominal infections: Results of the study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) in Taiwan, 2020」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此