TY - JOUR
T1 - Intubation difficulty scale contributors and time delay in clinical practice
AU - Kang, Ting Wei
AU - Wang, Jung-Der
AU - Tsai, Yi Seng
AU - Lin, Chung Ren
AU - Tseng, Chia Chih Alex
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/1/28
Y1 - 2022/1/28
N2 - AbstractThe intubation difficulty scale (IDS) includes 7 contributors that provide a comprehensive assessment of difficult intubation. However, the effect of each contributor is unclear, and the scale has not been revalidated recently and has not been validated in orient. This study determined the duration of successful intubation (DSI) for each of these 7 contributors.The patients were intubated by attending anesthesiologists. The duration and other data were recorded by 2 research assistants. Anaesthesiologists reported the IDS and their perceptions. A linear mixed-effects model with a DSI was constructed using IDS factors.In total, 1095 patients were enrolled. The average DSI was 23.9 ± 21.8 seconds (37.1% IDS = 0). All 7 factors were independently associated with duration, with the exception of vocal cord adduction. The best model was as follows: DSI (in seconds) = 15.2 + 31.1 (number of additional attempts) + 26.2 (number of additional operators) + 11.4 (number of alternative techniques) + 7.9 (increased lift force) + 4.9 (external laryngeal pressure) + 3.5 (Cormack grade 1). The mixed models were similar except for the regression coefficient for the number of alternative techniques that decreased from 11.4 to 6.9 seconds.We confirmed that each IDS contributor affects the DSI and validated a prediction model with 6 IDS contributors. This prediction model may facilitate the development of strategic plans for critical airway management. Furthermore, it could improve simulations and monitor learning progress and help provide valuable feedback.
AB - AbstractThe intubation difficulty scale (IDS) includes 7 contributors that provide a comprehensive assessment of difficult intubation. However, the effect of each contributor is unclear, and the scale has not been revalidated recently and has not been validated in orient. This study determined the duration of successful intubation (DSI) for each of these 7 contributors.The patients were intubated by attending anesthesiologists. The duration and other data were recorded by 2 research assistants. Anaesthesiologists reported the IDS and their perceptions. A linear mixed-effects model with a DSI was constructed using IDS factors.In total, 1095 patients were enrolled. The average DSI was 23.9 ± 21.8 seconds (37.1% IDS = 0). All 7 factors were independently associated with duration, with the exception of vocal cord adduction. The best model was as follows: DSI (in seconds) = 15.2 + 31.1 (number of additional attempts) + 26.2 (number of additional operators) + 11.4 (number of alternative techniques) + 7.9 (increased lift force) + 4.9 (external laryngeal pressure) + 3.5 (Cormack grade 1). The mixed models were similar except for the regression coefficient for the number of alternative techniques that decreased from 11.4 to 6.9 seconds.We confirmed that each IDS contributor affects the DSI and validated a prediction model with 6 IDS contributors. This prediction model may facilitate the development of strategic plans for critical airway management. Furthermore, it could improve simulations and monitor learning progress and help provide valuable feedback.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124167913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124167913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MD.0000000000028724
DO - 10.1097/MD.0000000000028724
M3 - Article
C2 - 35089244
AN - SCOPUS:85124167913
SN - 0025-7974
VL - 101
SP - E28724
JO - Medicine (United States)
JF - Medicine (United States)
IS - 4
ER -