TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigation of fine motor performance in children younger than 36-month-old using PDMS-2 and Bayley-III
AU - Lin, Ling Yi
AU - Tu, Yi Fang
AU - Yu, Wen Hao
AU - Ho, Meng Hsin
AU - Wu, Po Ming
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Cheng Kung University Hospital [NCKUH-1050611, 1060216]; Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 103-2314-B-006-017-MY3,MOST 106-2314-B-006-075,MOST 106-2314-B006-065].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/9/2
Y1 - 2020/9/2
N2 - The aim of the study was to investigate the concurrent validity of fine motor (FM) development scores between the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2), and Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). Both tests were administered to 223 children aged 13–36 months with suspected developmental delays from a medical centre. Concurrent validity and agreement of FM delay were assessed. The Bayley-III FM scale scores (FMSS) and motor composite quotients were moderately correlated with PDMS-2 FM quotients. The agreement of FM delay between the two instruments was excellent (Kappa coefficient value =.80) in children aged 13–18 months and good in children aged 19–36 months. When using PDMS-2 as the reference standard, Bayley-III (FMSS < 7) identified fewer children aged 19–24 months as delayed but more in children aged 25–36 months as delayed. When adjusting the cut-off point of Bayley-III FMSS to 8 for children aged 19–24 months and to 6 for children aged 25–36 months, the agreement improved between these two instruments. FM delays might be underestimated solely using Bayley-III in children aged 19–24 months. Additional tests, such as PDMS-2 should be considered to avoid delays in accessing early intervention services.
AB - The aim of the study was to investigate the concurrent validity of fine motor (FM) development scores between the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2), and Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). Both tests were administered to 223 children aged 13–36 months with suspected developmental delays from a medical centre. Concurrent validity and agreement of FM delay were assessed. The Bayley-III FM scale scores (FMSS) and motor composite quotients were moderately correlated with PDMS-2 FM quotients. The agreement of FM delay between the two instruments was excellent (Kappa coefficient value =.80) in children aged 13–18 months and good in children aged 19–36 months. When using PDMS-2 as the reference standard, Bayley-III (FMSS < 7) identified fewer children aged 19–24 months as delayed but more in children aged 25–36 months as delayed. When adjusting the cut-off point of Bayley-III FMSS to 8 for children aged 19–24 months and to 6 for children aged 25–36 months, the agreement improved between these two instruments. FM delays might be underestimated solely using Bayley-III in children aged 19–24 months. Additional tests, such as PDMS-2 should be considered to avoid delays in accessing early intervention services.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088775934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088775934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17405629.2020.1732917
DO - 10.1080/17405629.2020.1732917
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088775934
SN - 1740-5629
VL - 17
SP - 746
EP - 760
JO - European Journal of Developmental Psychology
JF - European Journal of Developmental Psychology
IS - 5
ER -