TY - JOUR
T1 - Lunotriquetral ligament properties
T2 - A comparison of three anatomic subregions
AU - Ritt, M. J.P.F.
AU - Bishop, A. T.
AU - Berger, R. A.
AU - Linscheid, R. L.
AU - Berglund, L. J.
AU - An, K. N.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - The physical attributes of 3 subregions of the lunotriquetral ligament were tested in a computer-controlled multiaxis testing machine using 12 specimens. This allowed measurement of forces, moments, and displacements when ligaments were subjected to distraction, dorsopalmar translation, proximal-distal translation with a 20 N limit, and rotation with a 0.5 Nm limit. After an intact test run, selected subregions were cut randomly. Together with an additional 12 bone-ligament-bone complexes, specimens were tested to failure with servo-hydraulic load at 5 mm/s. The palmar subregion was thickest (2.3 ± 0.3 mm), the dorsal and proximal progressively less. Intact rotational displacement was 35°± 5.1°, dorsopalmar displacement was 1.6 ± 0.4 mm and 1.2 ± 0.5 mm, respectively, proximal-distal displacement was 1.8 ± 0.5 mm and 1.3 ± 0.5 mm, respectively, and distractional displacement was 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. The dorsal subregion provided 62.3% ± 27.1% of the rotational resistance. The palmar subregion resisted 67.3% ± 14.1% of palmar translation, while with dorsal translation both regions resisted equally. Rotational displacement increased 15.3°± 5.6°after dorsal subregion sectioning. The palmar component failure force was 301 ± 36 N; the dorsal, 121 ± 42 N; and the proximal, 64 ± 14 N.
AB - The physical attributes of 3 subregions of the lunotriquetral ligament were tested in a computer-controlled multiaxis testing machine using 12 specimens. This allowed measurement of forces, moments, and displacements when ligaments were subjected to distraction, dorsopalmar translation, proximal-distal translation with a 20 N limit, and rotation with a 0.5 Nm limit. After an intact test run, selected subregions were cut randomly. Together with an additional 12 bone-ligament-bone complexes, specimens were tested to failure with servo-hydraulic load at 5 mm/s. The palmar subregion was thickest (2.3 ± 0.3 mm), the dorsal and proximal progressively less. Intact rotational displacement was 35°± 5.1°, dorsopalmar displacement was 1.6 ± 0.4 mm and 1.2 ± 0.5 mm, respectively, proximal-distal displacement was 1.8 ± 0.5 mm and 1.3 ± 0.5 mm, respectively, and distractional displacement was 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. The dorsal subregion provided 62.3% ± 27.1% of the rotational resistance. The palmar subregion resisted 67.3% ± 14.1% of palmar translation, while with dorsal translation both regions resisted equally. Rotational displacement increased 15.3°± 5.6°after dorsal subregion sectioning. The palmar component failure force was 301 ± 36 N; the dorsal, 121 ± 42 N; and the proximal, 64 ± 14 N.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032451599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032451599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80460-5
DO - 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80460-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 9620183
AN - SCOPUS:0032451599
SN - 0363-5023
VL - 23
SP - 425
EP - 431
JO - Journal of Hand Surgery
JF - Journal of Hand Surgery
IS - 3
ER -