TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimized shelter planning in flood-prone areas using geographic information systems (GIS) and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
T2 - an analysis of Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
AU - Tiangtrong, Ajira
AU - Mangmoon, Thanaporn
AU - Apirak, Sasinaree
AU - Amornwech, Noppadol
AU - Noipow, Nitipon
AU - Jan, Chyan Deng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2025.
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - As climate-related disasters increase worldwide, effective planning for emergency shelters is essential to reduce disaster risk and strengthen community resilience. While geospatial tools are increasingly used in disaster response, standard shelter site planning often lacks a systematic integration of social vulnerability and spatial risk factors. This study proposes a decision-support framework that combines Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify suitable shelter locations in flood-prone areas. A case study in Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand—where recurring floods have repeatedly displaced communities—illustrates the importance of anticipatory and inclusive planning. The framework incorporates dimensions of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, with a focus on especially at-risk groups, including older adults, persons with disabilities, women, children, and low-income populations. Evaluated shelter locations are classified into 5 levels: highly suitable, suitable, moderately suitable, unsuitable and highly unsuitable. Results show that 3, 11 and 300 out of 566 existing shelters were highly suitable, suitable and moderately suitable, respectively, based on flood risk, road access, and proximity to health facilities. The model achieved a validation accuracy of 96.21% using 2022 flood data. By reducing avoidable relocations, the approach enhances safety, equity, and operational efficiency. The findings support progress toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), 13 (Climate Action), and 10 (Reduced Inequalities). The GIS–AHP model is adaptable to other flood- or climate-affected regions, offering a practical tool for data-driven, inclusive disaster preparedness planning.
AB - As climate-related disasters increase worldwide, effective planning for emergency shelters is essential to reduce disaster risk and strengthen community resilience. While geospatial tools are increasingly used in disaster response, standard shelter site planning often lacks a systematic integration of social vulnerability and spatial risk factors. This study proposes a decision-support framework that combines Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify suitable shelter locations in flood-prone areas. A case study in Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand—where recurring floods have repeatedly displaced communities—illustrates the importance of anticipatory and inclusive planning. The framework incorporates dimensions of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, with a focus on especially at-risk groups, including older adults, persons with disabilities, women, children, and low-income populations. Evaluated shelter locations are classified into 5 levels: highly suitable, suitable, moderately suitable, unsuitable and highly unsuitable. Results show that 3, 11 and 300 out of 566 existing shelters were highly suitable, suitable and moderately suitable, respectively, based on flood risk, road access, and proximity to health facilities. The model achieved a validation accuracy of 96.21% using 2022 flood data. By reducing avoidable relocations, the approach enhances safety, equity, and operational efficiency. The findings support progress toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), 13 (Climate Action), and 10 (Reduced Inequalities). The GIS–AHP model is adaptable to other flood- or climate-affected regions, offering a practical tool for data-driven, inclusive disaster preparedness planning.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015488208
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015488208#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s11069-025-07604-6
DO - 10.1007/s11069-025-07604-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105015488208
SN - 0921-030X
VL - 121
SP - 21097
EP - 21119
JO - Natural Hazards
JF - Natural Hazards
IS - 18
ER -