TY - JOUR
T1 - Origin of coseismic anelastic deformation during the 2016 Mw 6.4 Meinong Earthquake, Taiwan
AU - Rau, Ruey Juin
AU - Wen, Yi Ying
AU - Ching, Kuo En
AU - Hsieh, Ming Che
AU - Lo, Yu Tsung
AU - Chiu, Chi Yu
AU - Hashimoto, Manabu
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Central Weather Bureau (CWB) of Taiwan for providing strong motion data and high-rate GNSS data. This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan with grant: MOST 108-2116-M-006-002 , 108-2116-M-194-01 1, and 108-2116-M-006-017-MY2 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/8/5
Y1 - 2022/8/5
N2 - An unexpectedly large uplift of 91 mm was detected by geodetic observations during the rupture of 2016 Mw 6.4 Meinong earthquake, Taiwan, which has been attributed as either a triggered anelastic and hydrologic related deformation from a proposed duplex/mud diapir or a triggered aseismic slip on a proposed backthrust. Here, using both high-rate GNSS and free-field strong motion data, we first estimated the coseismic source model. The locations of high PGV were inferred to explain the unexpected distribution of damaged buildings approximately 25–30 km west of the epicenter. Then, the aseismic surface displacements during the earthquake was differentiated using the coseismic source model. The aseismic extension of 3.8 μstrain is inferred at the unexpectedly large uplift region. Combining with local geology, residual gravity anomaly, seismic tomography, interseismic leveling vertical velocities, coseismic leveling uplifts and proposed Coulomb stress changes, the accelerated mud diapirism during the earthquake triggered by slip on the deep seismogenic fault was identified as the cause of unexpectedly large coseismic uplift.
AB - An unexpectedly large uplift of 91 mm was detected by geodetic observations during the rupture of 2016 Mw 6.4 Meinong earthquake, Taiwan, which has been attributed as either a triggered anelastic and hydrologic related deformation from a proposed duplex/mud diapir or a triggered aseismic slip on a proposed backthrust. Here, using both high-rate GNSS and free-field strong motion data, we first estimated the coseismic source model. The locations of high PGV were inferred to explain the unexpected distribution of damaged buildings approximately 25–30 km west of the epicenter. Then, the aseismic surface displacements during the earthquake was differentiated using the coseismic source model. The aseismic extension of 3.8 μstrain is inferred at the unexpectedly large uplift region. Combining with local geology, residual gravity anomaly, seismic tomography, interseismic leveling vertical velocities, coseismic leveling uplifts and proposed Coulomb stress changes, the accelerated mud diapirism during the earthquake triggered by slip on the deep seismogenic fault was identified as the cause of unexpectedly large coseismic uplift.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131461290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131461290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229428
DO - 10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229428
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85131461290
SN - 0040-1951
VL - 836
JO - Tectonophysics
JF - Tectonophysics
M1 - 229428
ER -