TY - JOUR
T1 - Preventing and treating brain metastases with three first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer
AU - Su, Po Lan
AU - Wu, Yi Lin
AU - Chang, Wei Yuan
AU - Ho, Chung Liang
AU - Tseng, Yau Lin
AU - Lai, Wu Wei
AU - Su, Wu Chou
AU - Lin, Chien Chung
AU - Yang, Szu Chun
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the grant MOHW106-TDU-B-211-144-004 from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan; the grants MOST 104-2314-B-006-046-MY3 and MOST105-2314-B-076-MY2 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan; and the grant NCKUH-10503002 from National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Funding Information:
Po-Lan Su and Yi-Lin Wu contributed equally to this work. We are indebted to Yi-Ting Yen, Wen-Ping Su, Shang-Yin Wu, Yu-Ming Yeh, and Cheng-Hung Lee for their generous support with the recruitment of subjects. This study is based in part on data from the Cancer Data Bank of National Cheng Kung University Hospital. This study was supported by the grant MOHW106-TDU-B-211-144-004 from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan; the grants MOST 104-2314-B-006-046-MY3 and MOST105-2314-B-076- MY2 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan; and the grant NCKUH-10503002 from National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2018.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Introduction: Brain metastases (BM) are common in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the prognosis is poor with few therapeutic options. This study evaluated the efficacy of three epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in preventing and treating BM in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Methods: Patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC who visited a tertiary referral center from 1 December 2013 to 30 November 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. They received gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib until disease progression, death, or intolerable adverse events. The cumulative incidence of subsequent BM of initial non-BM patients, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of the BM and non-BM patients were estimated and compared using the Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests. Results: 306 NSCLC patients were enrolled, with 116, 75, and 115 receiving first-line gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, respectively. The afatinib group had a better PFS [12.7 versus 9.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, p = 0.001] and OS (39.1 versus 22.0 months; HR 0.64, p = 0.035) than the gefitinib group. Afatinib tended to provide better BM prevention than gefitinib (BM cumulative incidence, HR 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.71, p < 0.001) according to a Cox model adjusted for possible confounders. Patients with initial BM had a shorter PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.015) than those without initial BM. Among the former, there were no differences in median PFS (p = 0.34) and median OS (p = 0.46) in the three EGFR-TKI groups. Conclusions: Our data suggested that, compared with gefitinib, afatinib provided better benefits significantly in terms of PFS and OS. Both had the same effectiveness in preventing subsequent BM.
AB - Introduction: Brain metastases (BM) are common in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the prognosis is poor with few therapeutic options. This study evaluated the efficacy of three epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in preventing and treating BM in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Methods: Patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC who visited a tertiary referral center from 1 December 2013 to 30 November 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. They received gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib until disease progression, death, or intolerable adverse events. The cumulative incidence of subsequent BM of initial non-BM patients, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of the BM and non-BM patients were estimated and compared using the Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests. Results: 306 NSCLC patients were enrolled, with 116, 75, and 115 receiving first-line gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, respectively. The afatinib group had a better PFS [12.7 versus 9.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, p = 0.001] and OS (39.1 versus 22.0 months; HR 0.64, p = 0.035) than the gefitinib group. Afatinib tended to provide better BM prevention than gefitinib (BM cumulative incidence, HR 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.71, p < 0.001) according to a Cox model adjusted for possible confounders. Patients with initial BM had a shorter PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.015) than those without initial BM. Among the former, there were no differences in median PFS (p = 0.34) and median OS (p = 0.46) in the three EGFR-TKI groups. Conclusions: Our data suggested that, compared with gefitinib, afatinib provided better benefits significantly in terms of PFS and OS. Both had the same effectiveness in preventing subsequent BM.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054600642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054600642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1758835918797589
DO - 10.1177/1758835918797589
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85054600642
SN - 1758-8340
VL - 10
JO - Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
JF - Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
ER -