TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantity and Diversity of Preliteracy Language Exposure Both Affect Literacy Development
T2 - Evidence from a Computational Model of Reading
AU - Chang, Ya Ning
AU - Monaghan, Padraic
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by ESRC grant RES-000-22-4049. All authors contributed in a significant way to the manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/5/4
Y1 - 2019/5/4
N2 - Diversity of vocabulary knowledge and quantity of language exposure prior to literacy are key predictors of reading development. However, diversity and quantity of exposure are difficult to distinguish in behavioural studies, and so the causal relations with literacy are not well known. We tested these relations by training a connectionist triangle model of reading that learned to map between semantic; phonological; and, later, orthographic forms of words. The model first learned to map between phonology and semantics, where we manipulated the quantity and diversity of this preliterate language experience. Then the model learned to read. Both diversity and quantity of exposure had unique effects on reading performance, with larger effects for written word comprehension than for reading fluency. The results further showed that quantity of preliteracy language exposure was beneficial only when this was to a varied vocabulary and could be an impediment when exposed to a limited vocabulary.
AB - Diversity of vocabulary knowledge and quantity of language exposure prior to literacy are key predictors of reading development. However, diversity and quantity of exposure are difficult to distinguish in behavioural studies, and so the causal relations with literacy are not well known. We tested these relations by training a connectionist triangle model of reading that learned to map between semantic; phonological; and, later, orthographic forms of words. The model first learned to map between phonology and semantics, where we manipulated the quantity and diversity of this preliterate language experience. Then the model learned to read. Both diversity and quantity of exposure had unique effects on reading performance, with larger effects for written word comprehension than for reading fluency. The results further showed that quantity of preliteracy language exposure was beneficial only when this was to a varied vocabulary and could be an impediment when exposed to a limited vocabulary.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054845975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054845975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10888438.2018.1529177
DO - 10.1080/10888438.2018.1529177
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85054845975
VL - 23
SP - 235
EP - 253
JO - Scientific Studies of Reading
JF - Scientific Studies of Reading
SN - 1088-8438
IS - 3
ER -