Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

Berthold Georg Englert; Kelvin Horia; Jibo Dai; Yink Loong Len; Hui Khoon Ng

doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104

Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

Berthold Georg Englert
, Kelvin Horia
, Jibo Dai
, Yink Loong Len
, Hui Khoon Ng

物理學系

研究成果: Article › 同行評審

12 引文斯高帕斯（Scopus）

摘要

We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.96.022126. In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

原文	English
文章編號	026104
期刊	Physical Review A
卷	99
發行號	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104
出版狀態	Published - 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

原子與分子物理與光學

存取文件

10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104

其它文件與鏈接

引用此

@article{8442d8e8cf7a412ca3a64b0d431cac0e,

title = "Reply to {"}comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' {"}",

abstract = "We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.96.022126. In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.",

author = "Englert, \{Berthold Georg\} and Kelvin Horia and Jibo Dai and Len, \{Yink Loong\} and Ng, \{Hui Khoon\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 American Physical Society.",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104",

language = "English",

volume = "99",

journal = "Physical Review A",

issn = "2469-9926",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

AU - Englert, Berthold Georg

AU - Horia, Kelvin

AU - Dai, Jibo

AU - Len, Yink Loong

AU - Ng, Hui Khoon

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.96.022126. In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

AB - We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.96.022126. In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85062449320

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85062449320#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062449320

SN - 2469-9926

VL - 99

JO - Physical Review A

JF - Physical Review A

IS - 2

M1 - 026104

ER -

Reply to "comment on 'Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

摘要

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

存取文件

其它文件與鏈接

指紋

引用此