TY - JOUR
T1 - Retracted
T2 - “Hydrogeochemical behavior of arsenic-enriched groundwater in the deltaic environment: Comparison between two study sites in West Bengal, India” [Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 99(1-4) (2008) 22–30](S0169772208000636)(10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.04.004)
AU - Mukherjee-Goswami, Aishwaya
AU - Nath, Bibhash
AU - Jana, Joydev
AU - Sahu, Sudip Jyoti
AU - Sarkar, Madhav Jyoti
AU - Jacks, Gunnar
AU - Bhattacharya, Prosun
AU - Mukherjee, Abhijit
AU - Polya, David A.
AU - Jean, Jiin Shuh
AU - Chatterjee, Debashis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2011
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - The above paper has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editors-in-Chief. Despite the inclusion of interesting original data in this paper, serious concerns have been raised about the manner of their interpretation in the Discussion section. Parts of papers Appl Geochem, 19 (2004), 1255–1293http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.02.001 and Water Res. Research, 37(2001), 109–117http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900270 have been plagiarized. An initial attempt to address this issue with the authors resulted in a Corrigendum but the explanations offered in this were not subjected to sufficient scrutiny, due to a combination of errors by the Publisher and the Editors-in-Chief, and were later judged to be incomplete.
AB - The above paper has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editors-in-Chief. Despite the inclusion of interesting original data in this paper, serious concerns have been raised about the manner of their interpretation in the Discussion section. Parts of papers Appl Geochem, 19 (2004), 1255–1293http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.02.001 and Water Res. Research, 37(2001), 109–117http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900270 have been plagiarized. An initial attempt to address this issue with the authors resulted in a Corrigendum but the explanations offered in this were not subjected to sufficient scrutiny, due to a combination of errors by the Publisher and the Editors-in-Chief, and were later judged to be incomplete.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870435243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870435243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.11.002
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:84870435243
SN - 0169-7722
VL - 146
SP - 74
JO - Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
JF - Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
ER -