Set size slope still does not distinguish parallel from serial search

Daniel R. Little; Ami Eidels; Joseph W. Houpt; Cheng Ta Yang

doi:10.1017/S0140525X16000157

Set size slope still does not distinguish parallel from serial search

Daniel R. Little, Ami Eidels, Joseph W. Houpt, Cheng Ta Yang

研究成果: Article › 同行評審

4 引文斯高帕斯（Scopus）

摘要

Much of the evidence for theories in visual search (including Hulleman & Olivers' [H&O's]) comes from inferences made using changes in mean RT as a function of the number of items in a display. We have known for more than 40 years that these inferences are based on flawed reasoning and obscured by model mimicry. Here we describe a method that avoids these problems.

原文	English
頁（從 - 到）	32-33
頁數	2
期刊	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
卷	40
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000157
出版狀態	Published - 2017 一月 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

神經心理學與生理心理學
生理學
行為神經科學

存取文件

10.1017/S0140525X16000157

其它文件與鏈接

引用此

@article{700382315dd5483990c16ee82e27d6f5,

title = "Set size slope still does not distinguish parallel from serial search",

abstract = "Much of the evidence for theories in visual search (including Hulleman & Olivers' [H&O's]) comes from inferences made using changes in mean RT as a function of the number of items in a display. We have known for more than 40 years that these inferences are based on flawed reasoning and obscured by model mimicry. Here we describe a method that avoids these problems.",

author = "Little, {Daniel R.} and Ami Eidels and Houpt, {Joseph W.} and Yang, {Cheng Ta}",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X16000157",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "32--33",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Set size slope still does not distinguish parallel from serial search

AU - Little, Daniel R.

AU - Eidels, Ami

AU - Houpt, Joseph W.

AU - Yang, Cheng Ta

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Much of the evidence for theories in visual search (including Hulleman & Olivers' [H&O's]) comes from inferences made using changes in mean RT as a function of the number of items in a display. We have known for more than 40 years that these inferences are based on flawed reasoning and obscured by model mimicry. Here we describe a method that avoids these problems.

AB - Much of the evidence for theories in visual search (including Hulleman & Olivers' [H&O's]) comes from inferences made using changes in mean RT as a function of the number of items in a display. We have known for more than 40 years that these inferences are based on flawed reasoning and obscured by model mimicry. Here we describe a method that avoids these problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056759440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056759440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X16000157

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X16000157

M3 - Article

C2 - 29342608

AN - SCOPUS:85056759440

VL - 40

SP - 32

EP - 33

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

ER -