TY - JOUR
T1 - Some considerations on numerical schemes for treating hyperbolicity issues in two-layer models
AU - Sarno, L.
AU - Carravetta, A.
AU - Martino, R.
AU - Papa, M. N.
AU - Tai, Y. C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Multi-layer depth-averaged models are widely employed in various hydraulic engineering applications. Yet, such models are not strictly hyperbolic. Their equation systems typically lose hyperbolicity when the relative velocities between layers become too large, which is associated with Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities involving turbulent momentum exchanges between the layers. Focusing on the two-layer case, we present a numerical improvement that locally avoids the loss of hyperbolicity. The proposed modification introduces an additional momentum exchange between layers, whose value is iteratively calculated to be strictly sufficient to keep the system hyperbolic. The approach can be easily implemented in any finite volume scheme and there is no limitation concerning the density ratio between layers. Numerical examples, employing both HLL-type and Roe-type approximate Riemann solvers, are reported to validate the method and its key features.
AB - Multi-layer depth-averaged models are widely employed in various hydraulic engineering applications. Yet, such models are not strictly hyperbolic. Their equation systems typically lose hyperbolicity when the relative velocities between layers become too large, which is associated with Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities involving turbulent momentum exchanges between the layers. Focusing on the two-layer case, we present a numerical improvement that locally avoids the loss of hyperbolicity. The proposed modification introduces an additional momentum exchange between layers, whose value is iteratively calculated to be strictly sufficient to keep the system hyperbolic. The approach can be easily implemented in any finite volume scheme and there is no limitation concerning the density ratio between layers. Numerical examples, employing both HLL-type and Roe-type approximate Riemann solvers, are reported to validate the method and its key features.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007448607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007448607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.12.014
DO - 10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.12.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85007448607
SN - 0309-1708
VL - 100
SP - 183
EP - 198
JO - Advances in Water Resources
JF - Advances in Water Resources
ER -