TY - JOUR
T1 - Stochastic analysis of dependable hydropower capacity
AU - Labadie, John W.
AU - Fontane, Darrell G.
AU - Tabios, Guillermo Q.
AU - Chou, Nine Fang
PY - 1987/5
Y1 - 1987/5
N2 - Indexed sequential modeling (ISM) has been proposed by the Western Area Power Administration as an alternative approach to developing firm marketable capacity, i.e., project-dependable hydropower capacity (PDC), in contrast with the usual approach of basing PDC on the most adverse period of record. ISM allows a probabilistic analysis of hydropower capacity by extracting a series of overlapping short-term (say, 10 year) inflow sequences directly from the historical record, which includes the most adverse period, and then simulating reservoir operations over this interval for each sequence. As a means of evaluating ISM, the New Melones Reservoir system in the federal Central Valley Project of California was selected as a case study for comparing hydropower output generated from ISM input with use of a multivariate stochastic inflow generation model. A comparison of monthly power and energy output at 95% confidence limits, 10% risk level, and most adverse, showed reasonably good correspondence between the two methods, except for a few months of energy production in the final year of simulation.
AB - Indexed sequential modeling (ISM) has been proposed by the Western Area Power Administration as an alternative approach to developing firm marketable capacity, i.e., project-dependable hydropower capacity (PDC), in contrast with the usual approach of basing PDC on the most adverse period of record. ISM allows a probabilistic analysis of hydropower capacity by extracting a series of overlapping short-term (say, 10 year) inflow sequences directly from the historical record, which includes the most adverse period, and then simulating reservoir operations over this interval for each sequence. As a means of evaluating ISM, the New Melones Reservoir system in the federal Central Valley Project of California was selected as a case study for comparing hydropower output generated from ISM input with use of a multivariate stochastic inflow generation model. A comparison of monthly power and energy output at 95% confidence limits, 10% risk level, and most adverse, showed reasonably good correspondence between the two methods, except for a few months of energy production in the final year of simulation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023525163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023525163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1987)113:3(422)
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1987)113:3(422)
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0023525163
SN - 0733-9496
VL - 113
SP - 422
EP - 437
JO - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
JF - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
IS - 3
ER -