TY - JOUR
T1 - Temperature determination using multispectral radiation thermometry algorithms for aluminum alloys
AU - Wen, Chang Da
N1 - Funding Information:
The author is grateful for the support of the National Science Council of Taiwan (with project number NSC-95-2221-E-006-393). The author also thanks J. King Aluminum, Inc. (JKAI), in Taiwan for the supply of steel samples and Dr. Jongmook Lim of the Spectraline, Inc., for technical assistance and instrument support.
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - Multispectral radiation thermometry (MRT) was applied to predict the aluminum surface temperature. Experiments were conducted to measure the spectral intensity values for five different aluminum alloys, AL1100, AL2024, AL5083, AL6061, and AL7005, at 600 K, 700 K, and 800 K. The experimental work is coupled with six MRT emissivity models encompassing mathematical and analytical functions to infer surface temperature. Assessment of the MRT emissivity model is subject to parametric effects of number of wavelengths, alloy composition, and temperature. Results show that increasing wavelength number does not significantly improve measurement accuracy while applying MRT. If the emissivity model can represent well the real emissivity behaviors, a more accurate inferred temperature can be achieved. Overall, most models achieve high accuracy in temperature prediction, except two emissivity models. One particular emissivity model provides the best compensation for the aforementioned parametric influences.
AB - Multispectral radiation thermometry (MRT) was applied to predict the aluminum surface temperature. Experiments were conducted to measure the spectral intensity values for five different aluminum alloys, AL1100, AL2024, AL5083, AL6061, and AL7005, at 600 K, 700 K, and 800 K. The experimental work is coupled with six MRT emissivity models encompassing mathematical and analytical functions to infer surface temperature. Assessment of the MRT emissivity model is subject to parametric effects of number of wavelengths, alloy composition, and temperature. Results show that increasing wavelength number does not significantly improve measurement accuracy while applying MRT. If the emissivity model can represent well the real emissivity behaviors, a more accurate inferred temperature can be achieved. Overall, most models achieve high accuracy in temperature prediction, except two emissivity models. One particular emissivity model provides the best compensation for the aforementioned parametric influences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551566671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551566671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01457632.2010.506383
DO - 10.1080/01457632.2010.506383
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79551566671
SN - 0145-7632
VL - 32
SP - 514
EP - 520
JO - Heat Transfer Engineering
JF - Heat Transfer Engineering
IS - 6
ER -