TY - JOUR
T1 - The mechanical analysis of a mass-spring load supported on a beam system
AU - Wang, Y. Z.
AU - Wang, K. S.
AU - Wang, R. T.
PY - 1984
Y1 - 1984
N2 - The static deflection and dynamic characteristics of a mass-spring system supported on beam systems are investigated in this paper. In statics, it shows that the maximum deflection is reduced considerably when a clamped-free beam is replaced by a beam system which consists of a primary beam one end of which is clamped and the other end is supported by a subsidiary beam. The addition of a subsidiary beam leads to axial forces in both beams, the primary one in tension and the subsidiary in compression. The dynamic characteristic shows that the natural frequency of the mass-spring system decreases. In some cases it becomes imaginary, because buckling occurs in the subsidiary beam. This means that the effects of the addition of a subsidiary beam are not always of a positive nature, with respect to the stiffness of the whole system. At low frequencies, the response of the mass is larger than that of the mass supported on a motionless foundation. At high frequencies the dynamic characteristics of the foundation influence the vibration of the mass only a little; i.e. it moves as if the foundation were motionless.
AB - The static deflection and dynamic characteristics of a mass-spring system supported on beam systems are investigated in this paper. In statics, it shows that the maximum deflection is reduced considerably when a clamped-free beam is replaced by a beam system which consists of a primary beam one end of which is clamped and the other end is supported by a subsidiary beam. The addition of a subsidiary beam leads to axial forces in both beams, the primary one in tension and the subsidiary in compression. The dynamic characteristic shows that the natural frequency of the mass-spring system decreases. In some cases it becomes imaginary, because buckling occurs in the subsidiary beam. This means that the effects of the addition of a subsidiary beam are not always of a positive nature, with respect to the stiffness of the whole system. At low frequencies, the response of the mass is larger than that of the mass supported on a motionless foundation. At high frequencies the dynamic characteristics of the foundation influence the vibration of the mass only a little; i.e. it moves as if the foundation were motionless.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021625380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021625380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0020-7403(84)90004-3
DO - 10.1016/0020-7403(84)90004-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0021625380
VL - 26
SP - 503
EP - 514
JO - International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
JF - International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
SN - 0020-7403
IS - 9-10
ER -