The moderating effects of goal orientations and goal structures on test-preparation strategies for Taiwanese students

Yen Ying Lin, Biing-Lin Cherng, Hsueh Chih Chen, Shu-Ling Peng

研究成果: Article

摘要

The current study examines the effects of a quasi-experimental classroom goal structure (mastery, approach performance, multiple that combined mastery/approach performance) and personal goal orientations on test-preparation strategies for 280 Taiwanese junior high school students in order to check whether this interaction supports either the buffering hypothesis or the matching hypothesis. There were significant interactive effects between goal orientations and goal structures on cognitive regulation and motivational/affective regulation strategies. In line with the matching hypothesis, students with goal orientations that matched their classroom goal structures were found to be most adaptive in regard to the use of their self-regulatory cognitive and self-regulatory motivational/affective test-preparation strategies.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)68-75
頁數8
期刊Learning and Individual Differences
56
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 2017 五月 1

指紋

Students
regulation
classroom
student
interaction
school
performance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

引用此文

@article{3a1698f6695d4669a1227246fcc6ccf5,
title = "The moderating effects of goal orientations and goal structures on test-preparation strategies for Taiwanese students",
abstract = "The current study examines the effects of a quasi-experimental classroom goal structure (mastery, approach performance, multiple that combined mastery/approach performance) and personal goal orientations on test-preparation strategies for 280 Taiwanese junior high school students in order to check whether this interaction supports either the buffering hypothesis or the matching hypothesis. There were significant interactive effects between goal orientations and goal structures on cognitive regulation and motivational/affective regulation strategies. In line with the matching hypothesis, students with goal orientations that matched their classroom goal structures were found to be most adaptive in regard to the use of their self-regulatory cognitive and self-regulatory motivational/affective test-preparation strategies.",
author = "Lin, {Yen Ying} and Biing-Lin Cherng and Chen, {Hsueh Chih} and Shu-Ling Peng",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.lindif.2017.04.004",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "68--75",
journal = "Learning and Individual Differences",
issn = "1041-6080",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The moderating effects of goal orientations and goal structures on test-preparation strategies for Taiwanese students

AU - Lin, Yen Ying

AU - Cherng, Biing-Lin

AU - Chen, Hsueh Chih

AU - Peng, Shu-Ling

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - The current study examines the effects of a quasi-experimental classroom goal structure (mastery, approach performance, multiple that combined mastery/approach performance) and personal goal orientations on test-preparation strategies for 280 Taiwanese junior high school students in order to check whether this interaction supports either the buffering hypothesis or the matching hypothesis. There were significant interactive effects between goal orientations and goal structures on cognitive regulation and motivational/affective regulation strategies. In line with the matching hypothesis, students with goal orientations that matched their classroom goal structures were found to be most adaptive in regard to the use of their self-regulatory cognitive and self-regulatory motivational/affective test-preparation strategies.

AB - The current study examines the effects of a quasi-experimental classroom goal structure (mastery, approach performance, multiple that combined mastery/approach performance) and personal goal orientations on test-preparation strategies for 280 Taiwanese junior high school students in order to check whether this interaction supports either the buffering hypothesis or the matching hypothesis. There were significant interactive effects between goal orientations and goal structures on cognitive regulation and motivational/affective regulation strategies. In line with the matching hypothesis, students with goal orientations that matched their classroom goal structures were found to be most adaptive in regard to the use of their self-regulatory cognitive and self-regulatory motivational/affective test-preparation strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019034102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019034102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.04.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85019034102

VL - 56

SP - 68

EP - 75

JO - Learning and Individual Differences

JF - Learning and Individual Differences

SN - 1041-6080

ER -