TY - JOUR
T1 - The relationship between restoration and furcation involvement on molar teeth.
AU - Wang, H. L.
AU - Burgett, F. G.
AU - Shyr, Y.
PY - 1993/4
Y1 - 1993/4
N2 - The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine the correlation between the presence of a crown (CR) or a proximal restoration (RE) and furcation involvement (FI) on molar teeth. Data were collected from 134 periodontal maintenance patients who had restored and non-restored molars present both with and without FI. A majority of the restorations that were present in these patients had been in place for at least 5 years prior to the study. First and second molars were examined clinically using the following criteria: CR, RE, FI, mobility (MO), and probing periodontal attachment level (AL). Data were analyzed with a statistical program utilizing Pearson chi-square and the pair-difference t test. The results indicated that molars with CR or RE had a significantly (P < 0.01) higher percentage of FI but no greater mobility when compared to molars without restorations. Mean probing periodontal attachment loss was greater for restored than non-restored molars but only with marginal significance (P = 0.051). There was a greater difference in mean AL between restored versus non-restored maxillary molars than for mandibular molars. This cross-sectional study provides evidence that molars with crowns or restorations involving the proximal tooth surfaces had a higher prevalence of FI and greater AL than molars without restorations.
AB - The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine the correlation between the presence of a crown (CR) or a proximal restoration (RE) and furcation involvement (FI) on molar teeth. Data were collected from 134 periodontal maintenance patients who had restored and non-restored molars present both with and without FI. A majority of the restorations that were present in these patients had been in place for at least 5 years prior to the study. First and second molars were examined clinically using the following criteria: CR, RE, FI, mobility (MO), and probing periodontal attachment level (AL). Data were analyzed with a statistical program utilizing Pearson chi-square and the pair-difference t test. The results indicated that molars with CR or RE had a significantly (P < 0.01) higher percentage of FI but no greater mobility when compared to molars without restorations. Mean probing periodontal attachment loss was greater for restored than non-restored molars but only with marginal significance (P = 0.051). There was a greater difference in mean AL between restored versus non-restored maxillary molars than for mandibular molars. This cross-sectional study provides evidence that molars with crowns or restorations involving the proximal tooth surfaces had a higher prevalence of FI and greater AL than molars without restorations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027581412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027581412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1902/jop.1993.64.4.302
DO - 10.1902/jop.1993.64.4.302
M3 - Article
C2 - 8483093
AN - SCOPUS:0027581412
SN - 0022-3492
VL - 64
SP - 302
EP - 305
JO - Journal of periodontology
JF - Journal of periodontology
IS - 4
ER -