TY - GEN
T1 - UWB transmitted reference signaling schemes - Part II
T2 - ICU 2005: 2005 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband
AU - Quek, Tony Q.S.
AU - Win, Moe Z.
AU - Dardari, Davide
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - In Part I [1] of this two-part paper, we provide uncoded bit error probability (BEP) analysis of various transmittedreference (TR) schemes by developing an analytical framework based on the sampling expansion approach. In this paper, the effect of narrowband interference (NBI) is taken into account to derive uncoded BEP expressions of TR and differential TR (DTR) signaling with an autocorrelation receiver (AcR). For simplicity, our NBI is modeled as a single tone interferer with Rayleigh distributed amplitude and an uniformly distributed random phase. We quantify the effect of NBI and channel power dispersion profile (PDP) on the optimum integration interval of AcR. Unlike the NBI-free situation, the optimum integration interval of AcR is not necessarily close to the delay spread, and depends on the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the channel PDP. Furthermore, our results also allow us to compare the NBI sensitivity of TR and DTR signaling.
AB - In Part I [1] of this two-part paper, we provide uncoded bit error probability (BEP) analysis of various transmittedreference (TR) schemes by developing an analytical framework based on the sampling expansion approach. In this paper, the effect of narrowband interference (NBI) is taken into account to derive uncoded BEP expressions of TR and differential TR (DTR) signaling with an autocorrelation receiver (AcR). For simplicity, our NBI is modeled as a single tone interferer with Rayleigh distributed amplitude and an uniformly distributed random phase. We quantify the effect of NBI and channel power dispersion profile (PDP) on the optimum integration interval of AcR. Unlike the NBI-free situation, the optimum integration interval of AcR is not necessarily close to the delay spread, and depends on the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the channel PDP. Furthermore, our results also allow us to compare the NBI sensitivity of TR and DTR signaling.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846195451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846195451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33846195451
SN - 078039397X
SN - 9780780393974
T3 - ICU 2005: 2005 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband, Conference Proceedings
SP - 593
EP - 598
BT - ICU 2005
Y2 - 5 September 2005 through 8 September 2005
ER -